Yaroslav Nilov LDPR biography. Deputy Yaroslav Nilov about harmful laws

Statesman, deputy of the State Duma, and the 7th convocation, deputy head of the LDPR faction. Chairman of the State Duma Committee on Labor, social policy and Veterans Affairs. One of the authors of the “law on blacklists”.

Biography

Born on March 20, 1982 in the city of Chisinau, Moldavian SSR. Graduated in 2005 ( technical university) majoring in “computers, complexes, systems and networks.” In 2014, he underwent professional retraining at the Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Service under the President of the Russian Federation (project management in the field of public services) as part of his preparation top level reserve of management personnel.

As a student, he participated in organizing a political club at school and invited the leader of the LDPR, Vladimir Zhirinovsky, to one of its meetings. He joined the LDPR in 1997, after which he created the LDPR youth organization in the city of Lyubertsy, Moscow region.

In 1998-2003 he was an assistant to V.V. Zhirinovsky on a voluntary basis, was engaged in social work, created a youth public organization"Center for Support of Youth Initiatives." In 2003-2007, he was an assistant to V.V. Zhirinovsky, who during this period served as deputy chairman of the State Duma. From 2007 to July 2011 - head of the secretariat of Deputy Chairman of the State Duma V.V. Zhirinovsky. Since July 2011 - deputy of the State Duma of the fifth convocation, since December 2011 - deputy of the State Duma of the sixth convocation.

In the period from January to May 2012, he was the first deputy chairman of the State Duma Committee on Regional Policy and Problems of the North and Far East. In the State Duma of the VI convocation, from May 16, 2012, he was the chairman of the State Duma Committee on Affairs public associations And religious organizations, in the State Duma of the VII convocation he heads the Committee on Labor, Social Policy and Veterans Affairs.

Member of the Supreme Council of the Liberal Democratic Party. Acting State Counselor Russian Federation 3 classes. Since 2007, he has been included in the Federal Reserve of Managerial Personnel.

We publish material based on the results of the meeting with the politician on his birthday. On behalf of the portal’s management, we congratulate Yaroslav Evgenievich on his 35th birthday and wish him health, happiness, prosperity and good luck.

Deputy faction leader Political party LDPR - Liberal Democratic Party of Russia.
Chairman of the State Duma Committee on Labor, Social Policy and Veterans Affairs.
Member of the State Duma Commission on Deputy Ethics.

Interview with Yaroslav Nilov

Yaroslav Evgenievich, good afternoon. Thank you for agreeing to chat with us.

I always try to be as open as possible to the press. Moreover, you are young and active, and I believe that young people should be supported.

It is known from your biography that, as a student, you participated in organizing a political club at school, to one of whose meetings you invited Vladimir Volfovich Zhirinovsky, and later created the LDPR youth organization in Lyubertsy. Where does such a passion for politics come from from an early age?

On the contrary, there was no passion anywhere near it - I was always interested in computers, programming, and creating websites. Then only the opportunity to use the Internet appeared, I studied the most simple languages: Basic, later Pascal. Then I took up object-oriented programming and wrote programs. I studied in a physics and mathematics class and was going to connect my life with activities in the field of information systems.

I have always been active, took part in social activities schools. There were the nineties, during Yeltsin’s presidency, when the country was simply torn apart... All this bothered me, but I was not particularly interested in politics. I observed, but did not dive in. Only there was an understanding that it was necessary to restore order. My history teacher, a caring person, proposed creating a political club at school and invited several students from each class. Ten people gathered at the first meeting. And he said: “Let's invite to club meetings officials" Someone suggested calling local deputies. This is the municipal district of Nekrasovka, next to Lyubertsy. Well, who cares if some official comes and tells us how much trash cans cost, what kind of pipes there are... Someone suggested that we invite the head of the council. In general, we thought and thought, and I remembered that someone was talking about V.V. Zhirinovsky. He was already a very famous politician then, young people loved him, he attracted attention with tough statements and bright speeches. Considering that I didn’t understand politics deeply at that time, I heard the name, but I didn’t really understand who, what, what party. And when they suggested inviting V.V. Zhirinovsky, I remember there was an ugly reaction from some young people: “He won’t come, why do this, probably, you still have to pay money for the meeting...”. Unfortunately, the problem is often that people, when some task or goal is set, do not look for means and opportunities to help achieve it, but for reasons why this should not be done. When I started working and studying further, I became more and more convinced that this attitude towards something new is holding us back very much. And it annoyed me. I played sports and understood: if you set yourself the goal of winning, then this is already 50% of success. If you say: “I will lose,” then you will probably lose, in any case, the probability of losing increases. Therefore, I believe that we must first use all possible means to achieve the goal. And I said: “Let’s try, and then we’ll say whether it will work or not.” They answered me: “Well, if you’re so confident, then go ahead and do it.” On the same day I found myself in the library, next to the school, and it turned out that V.V. Zhirinovsky from the State Duma sends brochures. One of them was called “The Last Car to the North.” I took this brochure, there were phone numbers there. I called, talked, I was sent several times, first to one unit, then to a youth organization, in the end, when the circle closed, I realized that I just had to be persistent. It was 1997, it took me six months, but the meeting took place. I understand that this was not easy for Vladimir Volfovich, because he had to travel from the center of Moscow beyond the Moscow Ring Road, about 30-40 kilometers, on Friday, the day of the plenary meeting. But Zhirinovsky promised and came. We gathered a large hall (although many did not expect it to appear) - about a thousand people waited outside, the hall could only accommodate 500.

Later other politicians came, but did not arouse such interest. When the meeting took place, the school began to look at me with completely different eyes. I periodically visited the State Duma and saw the speeches of deputies, watched how they were then broadcast on different channels, read, took press from different factions, analyzed, and gradually began to immerse myself in political life, I began to like it. We created a youth organization in Lyubertsy, then I was transferred to work in Moscow, where I headed the all-Russian youth organization. Later he began working in a faction in the State Duma, then headed the Secretariat of the Deputy Chairman of the State Duma, then the faction apparatus, and in 2011 he became a deputy.

I set this goal for myself in 1997 - to become a deputy of the State Duma. Accordingly, I went to her for 14 years. But when I achieved what I had planned, I already understood what the Duma was, what laws were, which part of the iceberg was above water, which part was underwater... And six months later the faction nominated me to the position of chairman of the committee. Then - on the affairs of public associations and religious organizations.

As we know, you are a supporter of propaganda healthy image life. Recently they came up with the following initiative: if a person does not smoke, the employer can give him additional days off. Do you think this does not infringe on the rights of smokers and is it beneficial for a manager to provide time off to an employee just because he does not smoke?

I have never smoked, since childhood I have had an extremely negative attitude towards it, especially towards women who smoke. As for stimulating moments, there should be them. It is more profitable for an employer to give an employee extra time off than to constantly not see him at work. What does it mean to go smoke? It’s five minutes - he went, five minutes - he smoked, five minutes - he came back and came to his senses. We multiply 15 minutes by four, five or six times, it turns out to be quite long, but this happens every day. Thus, it is better to encourage the employee to get rid of bad habits. Of course, everything must be voluntary. Now in the State Duma building - in general in departmental buildings - smoking is prohibited. The man went down the elevator, got dressed, went outside, smoked, came - he was gone for 25 minutes. And so - once it’s not, the second time it’s not, and the load is automatically transferred to the shoulders of other workers, plus the manager, who is accustomed to a certain dynamics, rhythm, to the fact that the employee is always nearby, experiences inconvenience. This affects the work process as a whole, the operation of the entire system, so it is, of course, more effective to combat smoking without infringing on the rights of smokers. The person himself will refuse bad habit, if he sees that it is more profitable. He may first stop smoking at work, then quit altogether. If you count how much money people “smoke”, add here the consequences of weakened immunity, treatment of diseases that are caused by cigarettes, purchase of medicines... In general, this is a blow to health, a waste of time, and a serious burden in material terms.

I think some stimulating moments wouldn't hurt. At the very least, you can do an experiment and see the reaction. I am convinced that many would simply give up cigarettes.

One more question about work issues. Not long ago you said that managers often use irregular working hours as a way to keep an employee in the office, which creates a serious burden on the latter. Saving money in this case also plays a role. This serious problem. How to solve it?

The Labor Code allows the use of such a concept as “irregular working hours”. For overtime, certain compensation is due - either material or additional days for vacation. For example, in the State Duma, some civil servants have irregular working hours. This is immediately written down in the contract with the employer. But, given that there is no criterion for “non-standardization”, there is a possibility for abuse. For example, you need to get rid of an employee. He is constantly given irregular working hours, just trying to survive: if you don’t like it, leave. Second point: four people worked, one was laid off, leaving three. The workload of the dismissed person was distributed, the working hours were increased, using the factor of irregularity. It is necessary to regulate the situation through amendments to the Labor Code. Either everything should be written in employment contracts: how much, how, on what days, to whom it applies. But it’s better in Labor Code. So that's all Federal law adjustable, there was no play for maneuver. Determine the circle of persons to whom this may apply. For example, the chief accountant, managers, heads of departments, so that ordinary employees cannot be affected. Plus, we need to set some limits and limits. For example, staying at work no more than a certain number of times a week or in total no more than a certain number of hours can be overworked.

In January of this year, the story literally thundered that in Kamchatka they were not allowed to see a sick person ambulance. And you stated that special-purpose vehicles should be able to freely travel wherever they need to go. However, it is known that in Moscow and other “rich” regions, private medical services are in demand, which actually serve as taxis. Let's say you need to get to the airport quickly - call an ambulance, get in, and drive through. How to separate these moments?

Several initiatives were received from the LDPR faction. For example, it was proposed to increase liability and confiscate the culprit’s car in case there are serious consequences, as was the case in Kamchatka. In general, in that situation, I think that the ambulance driver showed excessive aggression; his main task is to deliver a medic, a doctor, to the entrance. There is an expression: don’t pay attention to the fool, let him pass, and let him go on his way. Did he have such an opportunity? There was, but he began to demonstrate knowledge of traffic rules, giving rise to aggression. If he had behaved differently, perhaps everything would have ended differently. Indeed, from the point of view of the rules traffic The ambulance driver is right, but from the point of view of life, I think both are to blame, which led to the death of a person.

As for special vehicles in the role of a taxi, yes, indeed, not only ambulances - the police use them, traffic police and other vehicles that are equipped with appropriate signals. And the fact is that today you can’t even track how legally an ambulance is used, because that’s how they arrange everything. Their task is to transport the patient, and where, why - this is all recorded in waybills. Therefore, it is necessary to put things in order with internal documentation, strengthen responsibility for the use of such vehicles for other purposes, even to the extent of depriving the licenses of the relevant medical institutions. This is not such an acute problem, but it exists, it is relevant for Moscow, St. Petersburg, and other large cities. Here, in a local format, it would be possible to organize several raids, watch, track, and replicate serious cases in the media, and then this would stop.

Recently, the LDPR proposed banning extra-parliamentary parties from nominating presidential candidates. Don't you think that such an amendment infringes on the rights of an ordinary citizen to be elected?

No, there is no infringement. The point is that the opportunity for self-nomination remains - please go ahead and nominate yourself. About 80 parties are registered in Russia. This is a huge number, despite the fact that we have super-liberal legislation: 500 people, and already a party. It turns out that many parties are created without having anything. Of course, not every party has the right to nominate a candidate for the presidency. If an organization has not entered parliament, obviously its candidate will simply be a participant in the election campaign for show. He most likely will not have support. We believe there is parliamentary parties who should nominate presidential candidates because millions of our citizens voted for them. And representatives from them have an obvious chance to be elected, and not just participate to create some kind of entourage. If we move away from the topic of presidential elections, we know how they participate in regional elections, when the same lists of candidates are scattered in boxes across the election commissions of different regions, congresses are held on the same day with a difference of half an hour in the same hotel in Moscow. And then they engage in political bargaining, remove candidates, and simply make money from it. If we talk about the development of the party-political system and party-state relations, then parties should strive to get into parliament. In this case, the likelihood of the candidate being elected will increase. Otherwise, we will simply reduce turnout, people will lose confidence, and they will not have the desire to go to the polls. Because the result is known in advance. And representatives from non-parliamentary parties will do nothing more than self-PR.

In March 2016, V.V. Zhirinovsky named you as one of the possible successors...

We had a congress and was re-elected chairman. And I always have one answer to such questions: in the next 50 years this issue will not be relevant for the LDPR.

If you do take the post of head of the LDPR, what future of the party do you see?

In 50 years we will meet, you will probably already have your own TV channel, then we will talk about everything.

In your opinion, which bill is most important for adoption in Russia today?

I can't pick one in particular. In general, a bill that would adjust the parameters of the 2017 budget or a new budget for 2018. But in an edition that would suit all parliamentary parties, and not just “ United Russia" And changes to the Criminal Code are necessary: to decriminalize some articles, and in some cases, on the contrary, to increase liability. Remove Article 282 (this is an extremist article), because it is mainly citizens of Russian nationality who are imprisoned under it; Article 212.1, under which Dadin was convicted, for repeated violation of the rules social events. Administrative Code we need to edit the Housing Code. One of the most important topics is fees for major renovation. They can be left, but only if citizens have normal income, and it depends, among other things, on the parameters of the budget, revenue and expenditure parts. Tax code need to edit - the same transport tax has outlived its usefulness. The Unified State Examination should be abolished – this is the position of the Liberal Democratic Party. It is necessary to amend the Constitution, to indicate in the preamble that we have the Russian people, otherwise everyone is listed except them. There is such a dangerous thing in the basic law of the state, when the subjects are named: regions, territories, republics, and in brackets - states. “State” is a dangerous term in this case, because there is a certain hint of a possible manifestation of separatism. There are a lot of things that need to be corrected and improved; during plenary sessions there are dozens of bills on the agenda.

Or, on the contrary, harmful laws are adopted. The indexation of pensions for working pensioners was removed, and the funded part of the pension was frozen for several more years. People sometimes don’t even understand what we’re talking about, but it scares many people very much. They propose to introduce a “tax on non-workers”. Or increase the retirement age. There is no need to pass such bills!

You recorded a duet with Svetlana Ternova. Tell us in more detail how this idea was born and are there any similar ideas for the future?

When I was at school in Lyubertsy, we had a youth organization, and we met Mikhail Krug. The St. Anastasia the Pattern Maker Foundation was created to help people who were in colonies and pre-trial detention centers. When they left there, we helped with issues of resocialization and provided humanitarian assistance.

Once I went to a concert by Mikhail Krug. I was very calm about songs of this genre. It seemed to me that only bandits and former prisoners attended chanson concerts. And when I visited myself, there was a break in the pattern, because I saw women, young people, and elderly people, completely different nationalities and having nothing to do with crime. A variety of songs were performed, including lyrics that touch the soul. Moreover, the songs are all very deep, they have living notes, a deep philosophical meaning. It was there that I met Sveta Ternova. She was an aspiring singer at that time. Sveta won one of the competitions in Tver and was a backing vocalist for the Circle, singing a duet. When the singer was killed, she and I were “lost” and did not maintain any contact. Some time ago I wrote the song “Forgive me, Lord,” then we performed it together with Masha Rubanovskaya, a participant in the “Voice” project. It turned out well. As for the composition “Let's Talk,” which Krug sang with Ternova, I really like it. I have long wanted to record it with Sveta. And finally, it happened.

How seriously do you practice vocals?

Not serious. I studied at art school, painted, did arts and crafts - clay, leather goods, papier-mâché, wood painting... And I just sing for myself, I like it. Music education I have no.

Blitz survey

What is your hobby?

At one time, I collected stamps and coins, was interested in programming, and went in for sports. I love cooking in nature, it not only relaxes, but also allows me to show my creativity. Not just mechanically: take salt, sugar, pepper, meat, but when cooking is a whole process: you build a fire, make coals (and not ready-made coals from a pack), then fry kebabs, marinated in own recipe. I like to sing karaoke. I love to travel. I like watching documentaries. The more you look, the more you realize how much we don't know. They still can’t find the answer to how they built at different points several thousand years ago. globe pyramids. What happened to Hyperborea, Atlantis?..

I like to invent something. There is some problem that they cannot solve, they cannot model an algorithm of actions that would lead to the desired result. I also approach the election campaign creatively, as part of a hobby - I come up with various PR campaigns that, acting on the principle of soft power, evoke certain sympathy among the voter for the candidate or the party.

Who is your favorite writer?

I have several favorite writers. Probably Jules Verne is one of them. Daniel Defoe - I think that The Adventures of Robinson Crusoe should definitely be in school curriculum. The book makes the brain work, because none of us is immune from such a situation, and we don’t have basic knowledge, for example, how to make fire.

Pushkin, Yesenin, Lermontov are my favorite poets. I still remember the words that the hero of “Mtsyri” says: “When I begin to die, and, believe me, you won’t have to wait long...”. Very touching. I like some of the modern writers. I can recommend the book “The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People” by Stephen Covey.

Ability that you would like to have?

Depending on the situation. I watch ballroom dancing - I would like to dance like that. If you watch someone sing well or play the piano or guitar, you would love to learn. From another area - I would like to have psychic abilities.

Where would you like to live?

Where you can be complete harmony with others and nature.

What's your favorite dish?

There is no such thing. There are some dishes that I have loved since childhood. For example, the chicken cutlets that my mother made. Grandma's borscht

If you could chat with anyone who ever lived, who would it be?

Probably Jesus Christ. I would like to talk with the king of Sparta - Leonidas. Or with Ivan the Terrible. Or maybe with Edgar Cayce - he knew a lot.

What is your main flaw?

Gullibility.

What is your main character trait?

Achieve your goal.

Do you have a favorite saying?

“Go forward, don’t be afraid of anything, break stereotypes.” Zuckerberg's principle of life, and it stuck with me.

What is happiness for you?

Happiness for me is a far-fetched temporary state, happiness is component a question to which no one can yet give a definite answer. Because today one thing is put into this concept, tomorrow - a completely different one. Today a person feels happy, and tomorrow he realizes that yesterday he was not happy, but he is happy today. Such an abstract concept that reflects the state of a person’s soul, demonstrates his mood, shows whether he is inner world in harmony with the outside.

since July 2011

Yaroslav Evgenievich Nilov(born March 20, 1982, Chisinau) - Russian statesman, deputy of the State Duma, and the 7th convocation, deputy head of the LDPR faction. Chairman of the State Duma Committee on Labor, Social Policy and Veterans Affairs. One of the authors of the “blacklist law”.

Biography

Born on March 20, 1982 in the city of Chisinau, Moldavian SSR. In 2005 he graduated from a technical university with a degree in computers, complexes, systems and networks. In 2014, he underwent professional retraining at the Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation (project management in the field of public services) as part of training the highest level of the management personnel reserve.

In 1998-2003, he was an assistant to V.V. Zhirinovsky on a voluntary basis, was engaged in social work, and created the youth public organization “Center for Support of Youth Initiatives.” In 2003-2007, he was an assistant to V.V. Zhirinovsky, who during this period served as deputy chairman of the State Duma. From 2007 to July 2011 - head of the secretariat of Deputy Chairman of the State Duma V.V. Zhirinovsky. Since July 2011 - deputy of the State Duma of the fifth convocation, since December 2011 - deputy of the State Duma of the sixth convocation.

From January to May 2012, he was First Deputy Chairman of the State Duma Committee on Regional Policy and Problems of the North and Far East. In the State Duma of the VI convocation, from May 16, 2012, he was the Chairman of the State Duma Committee on Affairs of Public Associations and Religious Organizations; in the State Duma of the VII convocation, he heads the Committee on Labor, Social Policy and Veterans Affairs.

Member of the Supreme Council of the Liberal Democratic Party. Acting State Advisor of the Russian Federation, 3rd class. Since 2007, he has been included in the Federal Reserve of Managerial Personnel.

Awards

Write a review of the article "Nilov, Yaroslav Evgenievich"

Notes

Links

(duma.gov.ru)
- interview with Yaroslav Nilov (znak.com)



Main articles

Authors of 139-FZ

Protests against the law

Foreign analogues

Related Articles

Excerpt characterizing Nilov, Yaroslav Evgenievich

Prince Andrei arrived the evening before. Pierre came to him the next morning. Pierre expected to find Prince Andrei in almost the same position in which Natasha was, and therefore he was surprised when, entering the living room, he heard from the office the loud voice of Prince Andrei, animatedly saying something about some kind of St. Petersburg intrigue. The old prince and another voice occasionally interrupted him. Princess Marya came out to meet Pierre. She sighed, pointing her eyes at the door where Prince Andrei was, apparently wanting to express her sympathy for his grief; but Pierre saw from Princess Marya’s face that she was glad both about what happened and about how her brother accepted the news of his bride’s betrayal.
“He said he expected it,” she said. “I know that his pride will not allow him to express his feelings, but still better, much better, he endured it than I expected.” Apparently it had to be this way...
– But is it really all over? - said Pierre.
Princess Marya looked at him in surprise. She didn’t even understand how she could ask about this. Pierre entered the office. Prince Andrei, very changed, obviously healthier, but with a new, transverse wrinkle between his eyebrows, in civilian dress, stood opposite his father and Prince Meshchersky and argued heatedly, making energetic gestures. It was about Speransky, news of whose sudden exile and alleged betrayal had just reached Moscow.
“Now he (Speransky) is being judged and accused by all those who admired him a month ago,” said Prince Andrei, “and those who were not able to understand his goals.” It is very easy to judge a person in disgrace and blame him for all the mistakes of another; and I will say that if anything good has been done during the current reign, then everything good has been done by him - by him alone. “He stopped when he saw Pierre. His face trembled and immediately took on an angry expression. “And posterity will give him justice,” he finished, and immediately turned to Pierre.
- How are you? “You’re getting fatter,” he said animatedly, but the newly appeared wrinkle was carved even deeper on his forehead. “Yes, I’m healthy,” he answered Pierre’s question and grinned. It was clear to Pierre that his smile said: “I’m healthy, but no one needs my health.” Having said a few words with Pierre about the terrible road from the borders of Poland, about how he met people in Switzerland who knew Pierre, and about Mr. Desalles, whom he brought from abroad as his son’s teacher, Prince Andrei again heatedly intervened in the conversation about Speransky , which continued between two old men.
“If there had been treason and there had been evidence of his secret relations with Napoleon, then they would have been publicly announced,” he said with vehemence and haste. – I personally do not like and did not like Speransky, but I love justice. - Pierre now recognized in his friend the all-too-familiar need to worry and argue about a matter alien to himself, only in order to drown out too heavy spiritual thoughts.
When Prince Meshchersky left, Prince Andrei took Pierre's arm and invited him into the room that was reserved for him. The room had a broken bed and open suitcases and chests. Prince Andrei went up to one of them and took out a box. From the box he took out a bundle in paper. He did everything silently and very quickly. He stood up and cleared his throat. His face was frowning and his lips were pursed.
“Forgive me if I’m bothering you...” Pierre realized that Prince Andrei wanted to talk about Natasha, and his broad face expressed regret and sympathy. This expression on Pierre's face angered Prince Andrei; he continued decisively, loudly and unpleasantly: “I received a refusal from Countess Rostova, and I heard rumors about your brother-in-law seeking her hand, or the like.” Is this true?
“It’s both true and not true,” Pierre began; but Prince Andrei interrupted him.
“Here are her letters and a portrait,” he said. He took the bundle from the table and handed it to Pierre.
- Give this to the Countess... if you see her.
“She is very sick,” said Pierre.
- So she’s still here? - said Prince Andrei. - And Prince Kuragin? – he asked quickly.
- He left a long time ago. She was dying...
“I’m very sorry about her illness,” said Prince Andrei. – He grinned coldly, evilly, unpleasantly, like his father.
- But Mr. Kuragin, therefore, did not deign to give Countess Rostov his hand? - said Prince Andrei. He snorted several times.
“He couldn’t get married because he was married,” said Pierre.
Prince Andrei laughed unpleasantly, again resembling his father.
- Where is he now, your brother-in-law, may I know? - he said.
- He went to Peter... “however, I don’t know,” said Pierre.
“Well, it’s all the same,” said Prince Andrei. “Tell Countess Rostova that she was and is completely free, and that I wish her all the best.”
Pierre picked up a bunch of papers. Prince Andrei, as if remembering whether he needed to say something else or waiting to see if Pierre would say something, looked at him with a fixed gaze.
“Listen, do you remember our argument in St. Petersburg,” said Pierre, remember about...
“I remember,” Prince Andrei hastily answered, “I said that a fallen woman must be forgiven, but I did not say that I can forgive.” I can't.

Yaroslav Evgenievich Nilov(born March 20, 1982, Chisinau) - Russian statesman, deputy of the State Duma of the V, VI and VII convocations, deputy head of the LDPR faction. Chairman of the State Duma Committee on Labor, Social Policy and Veterans Affairs. One of the authors of the “blacklist law”.

Biography

Born on March 20, 1982 in the city of Chisinau, Moldavian SSR. In 2005 he graduated from the Moscow Energy Institute (Technical University) with a degree in computers, complexes, systems and networks. In 2014, he underwent professional retraining in Russian Academy national economy and civil service under the President of the Russian Federation (project management in the field of public services) as part of the training of the highest level of the reserve of management personnel.

In March 2016, Vladimir Zhirinovsky named Nilov as one of his possible successors.

Awards

Medal of the Order of Merit for the Fatherland, II degree (2013) - for his great contribution to the development of Russian parliamentarism and active legislative activity
Gratitude from the President of the Russian Federation
Honorary badge of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation “For merits in the development of parliamentarism”
Certificate of Honor of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation
Gratitude from the Chief of Staff of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation

Family

Not married.

Biography

Born in 1982 in Moscow. Graduated Moscow Energy Institute in 2005 with a degree in systems engineering. Graduated in 2010 State Academy innovation.

Yaroslav decided to become a deputy of the State Duma while still at school and achieved his goal 14 years later. This path, as Nilov himself admits, was not easy.

As a student, he organized a political club at school and invited the leader of the LDPR to one of its meetings. Nobody believed that this was possible. However, Yaroslav was persistent and famous politician found time and came to the usual secondary school Lyubertsy district. This was back in 1997.

Joined in 1997. Then Yaroslav created the LDPR youth organization in Lyubertsy.

From 1998 to 2003, assistant to V. Zhirinovsky on a voluntary basis. He did a lot of social work: he created a youth public organization "Youth Initiatives Support Center".

In 1999, after meeting the singer Mikhail Krug, created with him a foundation named after the Holy Great Martyr Anastasia the Pattern Maker, which supported people released from prison with the aim of their resocialization.

Then Yaroslav was hired to work in the secretariat of V.V. Zhirinovsky: first as an assistant from 2003 to 2007, and then as head of the secretariat (2007 - July 2011). He worked in the LDPR apparatus for a total of 8 years.

Since 2007, he has been included in the Federal Reserve of Managerial Personnel.

At the age of 28, Yaroslav Nilov became a deputy of the fifth convocation (July 2011), and in December 2011, the current sixth convocation State Duma.

Having become a deputy, Nilov actively participated in the work of the lower house of parliament: his pointed questions and critical speeches at plenary sessions made the young deputy a recognizable politician.

After less than two years of working as a deputy, Yaroslav became deputy head of the LDPR faction in the State Duma, and later he headed the Duma Committee on Affairs of Public Associations and Religious Organizations, since this post became vacant after the appointment of the former chairman of the committee Alexey Ostrovsky became governor of the Smolensk region. This committee was a quota for the LDPR faction and the faction decided that it would be headed by Nilov.

Yaroslav Nilov is the author of several bills: he often submits bills relating to traffic rules to the State Duma. In 2010 he was one of the authors of the brochure "LDPR to the driver"- explaining how to interpret this or that offense and what sanctions should be applied for it.

In September 2014, Yaroslav Nilov said regarding tow trucks, " the more cars are towed, the more money will be siphoned out of car owners’ wallets".

According to the deputy, tow truck drivers receive bonuses for each car taken away, since there is a certain plan for evacuated cars. " We believe that it is time to move away from this barbaric method and move on to a civilized one. Evacuation should not remain as it is today", said Yaroslav Nilov.

According to him, “for three years I’ve been “rocking” the topic of abolishing intranet roaming for mobile communications, to which the Ministry of Communications finally began to listen.

On November 24, 2014, deputies from the LDPR, including Yaroslav Nilov, became the authors of a legislative initiative to create barriers to direct demonstration alcoholic products:

"When retailing alcoholic products (except for beer and beer drinks, cider, poire, mead) in a stationary retail facility, special places (departments, sections, rooms) must be allocated so that the demonstration of alcoholic products is carried out separately from other types of products and goods , and the demonstration site was not accessible to direct, barrier-free viewing by buyers from those locations shopping facility, which sell other products and goods".

On November 21, 2014, the State Duma adopted a bill introducing trade tax. The LDPR faction did not support this bill. Parliamentarians from the LDPR, including Y. Nilov, turned to V. Matvienko with a request to reject the bill and create a conciliation commission to finalize it.

The message says: " We believe that in conditions economic crisis, aggravated by the difficult geopolitical situation, the fall in oil prices, the decline in real disposable cash income of the population and consumer demand, the introduction of additional taxes and fees will significantly worsen the operating conditions of small businesses, and, ultimately, all costs associated with paying the new fee will be transferred to population".

In an interview, Yaroslav rated the efficiency of the deputies of the State Duma of the sixth convocation as “three”.

"Today the status of the deputy has been diminished. Deputy requests most often receive only replies; in fact, it is impossible to resolve voters’ questions. Then, voting in the hall... You can vote for the bills on the agenda in the morning in the hall and not discuss anything - the result will not change in any way compared to what will happen in the evening at the “voting hour”. Everything is known in advance and predictable, so the incentive and interest in work disappears. You understand that you can introduce a bill, but the party in power will reject it - it has enough votes".

Not long ago, LDPR leader Vladimir Zhirinovsky named Yaroslav Nilov among his successors. True, he modestly replied that “in the next 50 years this issue is simply irrelevant. The party will be led by Vladimir Volfovich.”

In early December 2015, when truckers’ protests intensified over the introduction of the “Platon” toll collection system, Nikiforov supported the protesters, declaring from the State Duma rostrum that fees for truckers resembled bureaucratic terrorism. In this regard, the parliamentarian called for a moratorium on such gatherings in order to extinguish social protest.

Yaroslav Nilov was awarded the medal of the Order of Merit for the Fatherland, II degree (June 12, 2013) - for his great contribution to the development of Russian parliamentarism and active legislative activity.

Income

For 2013, according to the declaration, Nilov earned: 3,020,990 rubles. Apartment (rent for the term of office of a State Duma deputy) 86.50, apartment (free use) 60.4 m, dacha (rent for the term of office of a State Duma deputy 190.9 m.

Scandals

In April 2014 Smolensk region visited the LDPR propaganda train. The interests of the party were represented by State Duma deputy Yaroslav Nilov, who lately protects the Smolensk region from the Duma faction of the LDPR.

In his fiery speech, Nilov recommended the LDPR as the only party that is not ashamed to look people in the eyes. " We are truly the voice of the common people in State Duma “- said the deputy, and immediately spoke unflatteringly about his colleagues in the State Duma.

The party in power, according to Nilov, is “hiding behind a screen of tolerance,” “communist internationalists” “supplied the national republics to the detriment of the Russian people.”

Worst of all: following the governor Alexey Ostrovsky, Nilov called it “a party of political homeless people and political trash.” After distributing bags of gifts and young activists collecting instructions on duty, the propaganda train set off for the regional center.

October 25, 2014, between Victoria Lopyreva and a flight attendant on an Aeroflot flight from Yekaterinburg to Moscow, there was a conflict that could escalate into litigation.

State Duma deputy Yaroslav Nilov responded to the situation. He sent a letter to the general director of Aeroflot with a request to reward the crew members who removed the famous passenger from the flight, who, in his opinion, behaved inappropriately.

On December 4, 2015, Nilov carried a living person to a meeting of the Duma white rabbit. Thus, the parliamentarian decided to draw the attention of deputies to the problem of livestock development.