Essay: Terrorism is a global problem of our time. Terrorism as an international problem of our time Essay on whether it is possible to eradicate terrorism

Terrorism, in all its forms and manifestations, in its scale and intensity, in its inhumanity and cruelty, has now become one of the most acute and pressing problems of global significance. Manifestations of terrorism entail mass casualties, destruction of spiritual, material, cultural values, which cannot be recreated for centuries. It generates hatred and mistrust between social and national groups. Terrorist acts have led to the need to create an international system to combat it. For many people, groups and organizations, terrorism has become a way to solve problems: political, religious, national. Terrorism refers to those types of criminal violence that can target innocent people who have nothing to do with the conflict. Terrorism as global problem requires constant attention and study and therefore represents a wide field for research with subsequent practical application.

The relevance of the chosen topic is dictated by our reality. The scale and cruelty of modern terrorism, the need for a continuous fight against it, only confirms the relevance of the work.

By the end of the twentieth century. international crime has become global. International criminal organizations have strengthened their positions both due to increased migration flows, greater openness of state borders, the development of information technologies that facilitate the coordination of criminal organizations and complicate control by the authorities, and due to the unresolved problem of poverty, uncoordinated legislation of different countries, and the weakness and corruption of individual governments.

The resolution of the World Conference on Organized Transnational Crime, held in Naples in 1994, identified ten main threats posed by international crime: the sovereignty of states, society, individuals, national stability and state control, democratic values ​​and public institutions, national economy, financial institutions, democratization and privatization, development, global regimes and codes of conduct.

In the 21st century Such a type of international crime as global terrorism is becoming particularly relevant. This problem began to be discussed publicly after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 in the United States.

Among the numerous reasons giving rise to global terrorism, mention should be made of the formation of a “unipolar” world in the last decade of the twentieth century, where the United States began to be perceived as the dominant power and, accordingly, was held responsible for uneven economic development other countries. Globalization, which brings with it Western values, also contributes to the growth of nationalist sentiments, causing rejection among supporters of traditional views. The phenomenon of global terrorism today is also associated with the phenomenon of “asymmetrical wars”, where, on the one hand, there is a continuation of the policy of globalization through military means, and on the other, resistance in the form of terrorist acts leading to the death of civilians. The modern world is oversaturated with various types of weapons mass destruction(nuclear, chemical, biological), therefore the possibility of such weapons falling into the hands of terrorists represents a threat on a global scale.

Chapter 1. Global problems of our time

1.1. The essence of global problems Origin of the concept

The concept of “global problems of our time” has become widespread since the late 60s - early 70s, since then occupying a prominent place in the scientific and political lexicon and firmly entrenched in the mass consciousness. It is often used as a fashionable term applied to events and phenomena that are not considered global. This happens if they equate “one’s own” and “global” (for example, referring to the social problems of any particular country, they call them global).

In philosophy, this problem is solved by identifying the appropriate criteria by which a particular problem is defined as global and thereby separated from many others that are not.

Etymologically, the term “global” comes from Lat. globus - globe. Hence the problems that affect the interests of both humanity as a whole and each individual person in different parts of the planet, i.e. those that are of a universal human nature are usually called global. They have a significant impact on the development of individual countries and regions, being a powerful objective factor in the global economic and social development. Their solution presupposes the unification of the efforts of the absolute majority of states and organizations at the international level, while their unresolution threatens catastrophic consequences for the future of all humanity.

Problems at different levels

Since global problems affect not only the world as a whole, but also manifest themselves at the level of its regions, and even individual countries, in scientific literature Along with the recognition of their universal significance, they are also distinguished from the problems of particular, local, regional ones, the essence of which is different, and the sphere of influence is much narrower. Considering problems of various levels as a specific expression of the philosophical categories “general”, “special” and “individual”, they are usually interpreted in such a way that particular problems appear as individual, local and regional as special, and global as universal. This approach also sets the main criterion that underlies the identification of these problems. It is called geographical because it expresses the spatial scale, or, in other words, the territory in which certain problems occur.

Hence, private problems are those that relate to a specific area of ​​state activity, individual settlements or small natural objects.

These are, as a rule, various problems arising as a result of various accidents, breakdowns, local social conflicts, etc.

The concept of “local” refers to problems of a higher order when it comes to individual countries or significant areas of the largest of them. It's about, as a rule, about strong earthquakes, major floods or, for example, civil war in a small state.

Regional problems already affect the range of topical issues that arise within individual continents, large socio-economic regions of the world, or in fairly large states. Examples of this kind can be the Chernobyl tragedy with all its consequences or climate change in fairly large areas covering a number of states. The “catastrophe of the century” was, for example, the drought of 1968 in the Sahel zone, which affected 18 states of the African continent, when more than 250 thousand people and about 18 million heads of livestock died from famine, epidemics of dangerous diseases arose, and the territory of this huge region was practically everything turned into desert.

In socio-political and scientific terminology, the concept of “national problems” is often used, which reflects certain difficulties and concerns of a particular state or national community. Depending on their scale, they can be interpreted as regional or local problems.

Finally, global problems span the entire globe; and not only that part of it where people directly live, but also the rest of its surface, bowels, atmosphere and even outer space that fall within the sphere of human activity.

Thus, when we talk about global problems, we mean the planet as a whole, and the region is taken as the largest unit of its division. Moreover, the number of regions and their scale are determined by the nature of the problems under consideration. For example, when studying the problem of economic backwardness on a global scale, they usually limit themselves to dividing the entire planet into two regions - developed and developing countries. When considering demographic, energy or raw materials problems, the number of regions, as a rule, increases and each time is determined by the specific objectives of the study.

It is important to note that any problem can only be considered global when it is relevant in relation to any region of the planet, i.e. manifests itself in each of them. Otherwise, we will be talking about problems of one or several regions (or an even smaller scale).

It follows from this that all global problems have at the same time regional significance, but not all problems found at the regional level are global. Obviously, the number of the latter will be somewhat smaller. As for other levels, global problems may not have a direct local or private manifestation or may affect them to an insignificant extent. For example, in Antarctica or other parts of the planet, located at a sufficiently large distance from the main centers and sources of environmental pollution, the condition of the air or water basins may be satisfactory, and the anthropogenic impact on natural environment practically not felt. However, this does not call into question the planetary nature of the environmental problem, the severity of which depends on the unevenness of anthropogenic influence on the natural environment. In turn, not all local, and especially private problems are related to global ones, because their number is disproportionately greater.

The above reasoning makes it possible not only scientifically, but also in practical terms to distinguish between global and regional problems, since all global problems relate to a single system that does not change in its scale - to the planet as a whole. Hence their number for a given system at a certain historical stage is quite definite. At the same time, the number of problems at other levels cannot be strictly taken into account, because the boundaries of both regions and different areas are accepted conditionally depending on the goals and objectives of the study.

Globality criteria

For a more rigorous definition of the actual global problems in science and philosophy, in addition to the already mentioned “geographical” criterion, additional criteria are introduced that characterize them from the other side - from the side of their quality, the essential features that they and only they possess. Among these features, what stands out first is that global problems inherently affect the interests of not only individual people, but also the fate of all humanity.

Secondly, overcoming them requires targeted, coordinated actions and the combined efforts of at least the majority of the planet's population.

Thirdly, these problems are an objective factor in world development and cannot be ignored by anyone.

Fourthly, the failure to resolve global problems can lead in the future to serious, possibly irreparable consequences for all of humanity and its environment.

In addition to the noted criteria, a number of features of global problems are often pointed out. Unlike regional ones, and even more so local and private ones, they are more inert and have less mobility. They gradually and for a long time are formed before they begin to meet all the above criteria for globality, and as they are resolved they can (theoretically) lose their relevance on a global scale, moving to a lower level. But this matter is so difficult that the short history of their existence does not yet know such examples.

Another fundamental feature of global problems is that they are all in such a complex interdependence that solving one of them requires at least taking into account the influence of other problems on it.

1.2. The role of philosophy in solving global problems

The relationship between science and philosophy

Science has always come to the aid of man in solving difficult and complex problems. Much of what once seemed insurmountable, beyond the limits of human capabilities, was eventually overcome with her help. It is natural, therefore, that the very first mentions and warnings about the dangers from global problems forced people to turn their attention to science, and scientists to think about ways to solve these problems.

The unusualness and novelty of the current situation lies in the fact that if any specific problems can be studied either by an individual science or by several sciences operating in a complex, then global problems as a whole, which represent a complex system covering man, society and nature in their numerous interrelations and interdependencies, individual sciences cannot do. The framework of specific disciplines is too narrow to see this or that particular problem - the object of their study in the context of other global problems. Therefore, regardless of what specific problems a particular discipline solves, a necessary condition is always a philosophical view of the processes and phenomena that accompany them, i.e. on the entire situation as a whole, including the ultimately obtained results.

Any special sciences at a certain stage, one way or another, need a philosophical understanding of the subject of their research. Without such a broad, holistic view of its subject and the problems facing humanity, going beyond the boundaries of a specific discipline, which would also reflect all latest achievements in other areas of knowledge, neither fundamental discoveries nor the development of science itself in general are possible.

Thus, we are talking, on the one hand, about the philosophical solution of issues, and on the other hand, about the fact that philosophy stimulates the interaction of a wide range of sciences, in the process of which their interdisciplinary unification plays an important role.

Philosophy plays a significant role in solving global problems, although there is an opinion that it (philosophy) studies too general issues, quite abstract from everyday life and people's practices. However, this is not entirely correct, or rather, a superficial judgment about philosophy, for it is well known that generalizing theories, if considered from a broader perspective, often turn out to be much more practical than many specific areas of knowledge. Of course, it cannot be said that philosophy necessarily and directly influences the adoption of political and other decisions, although this point should not be completely excluded. But still, its main function is to shape the worldview and thereby have an indirect influence on the process of developing practical solutions. Its task is not to directly consider the natural scientific or technical aspects of global problems, but to provide an ideological, methodological, cultural, and ethical basis for relevant decisions from other sciences.

Based on the achievements of specific disciplines in a given field, philosophical research is abstracted from particulars and considers global problems only to the extent that they determine each other. In other words, the philosophical approach involves considering global problems in their unity, integrity and interconnection from the point of view of their social significance and social conditionality. Such research involves, first of all, identifying the essence of global problems, since the establishment of their true nature and genesis largely predetermines the ways of their further scientific and practical solution.

Features of the philosophical approach

Highlighting the specifics of philosophical understanding of global problems, we note the most important features inherent only to this form of knowledge, arising from the main functions of philosophy.

Firstly, philosophy, forming a worldview, sets certain value guidelines, which largely determine the direction of human activity. In this way, its worldview and axiological functions are realized.

Secondly, the lack of a holistic understanding of complex systems studied by various sciences is a serious obstacle to the interaction of various disciplines. In this regard, the methodological function of philosophy, generalizing theories that arise in its depths, turn out to be fundamentally necessary, because they contribute to the integration scientific knowledge.

Thirdly, philosophy makes it possible to explain social phenomena and processes in a historical context; it formulates the most general laws of the development of society and nature and therefore, in the study of global problems, aims to understand them as a natural phenomenon organically connected with social progress. The emergence of global problems is thus viewed not as an accident or a manifestation of a blind fate that dooms humanity in advance to destruction, but as the result of an objective process of contradictory development of human history.

Fourthly, from a philosophical position, it seems possible to see the general trend in the development of global problems, the dynamics of their interaction and the interdependence in which they are located.

Fifthly, philosophy performs a cultural function in that it makes it possible to develop a culture of theoretical thinking. Studying the history of philosophy various peoples It also allows you to get acquainted with their culture, without which none of the problems facing these people can be solved.

Sixthly, the result of a holistic vision of the natural historical process and a dialectical approach to its interpretation is the possibility of a clearer orientation in the rapidly growing flow of scientific information on global problems.

Seventhly, philosophy raises questions of the meaning of human life, death and immortality, which in the face of the threat from global problems acquires special significance and relevance.

And finally, another important methodological function of philosophy is its development of a number of categories: “nature”, “society”, “civilization”, “social progress”, “scientific and technological revolution”, etc., which have a direct connection with modern relevant problems of humanity and play a large role in comprehending and understanding the objective trends of world development.

Having clarified the actual philosophical approach to the study of global problems of our time, let us now consider the problems themselves from these positions.

Conclusion: Now, in the 21st century, humanity is closely faced with the most acute global problems that threaten the very existence of civilization and even life itself on our planet. The term “global” itself originates from Latin word“globe”, that is, the Earth, the globe, and since the late 60s of the 20th century it has become widespread to designate the most important and urgent planetary problems of the modern era, affecting humanity as a whole. This is a set of such acute life problems, on the solution of which the further social progress of mankind depends and which, in turn, can themselves be resolved only thanks to this progress.

Philosophy plays a significant role in solving global problems and the philosophical approach involves considering global problems in their unity, integrity and interconnection from the point of view of their social significance and social conditionality. Such research is aimed, first of all, at identifying the essence of global problems, since establishing their true nature and genesis largely predetermines the ways of their further scientific and practical solution.

Chapter 2. Terrorism and the fight against it.

2.1. Terrorism is a global problem of our time

This transformation is due to the following reasons:

Firstly, terrorism, unfortunately, is becoming increasingly widespread on a planetary scale. It manifests itself both in regions of traditional international conflicts (for example, the Middle East, South Asia), and the most developed and prosperous states (in particular the USA and Western Europe).

Secondly, terrorism poses a serious threat to the security of individual states and the entire world community as a whole. Every year hundreds of acts of terrorism are committed in the world, and the sad count of their victims amounts to thousands of killed and maimed people;

Thirdly, the efforts of one great power or even a group of highly developed states are not enough to combat terrorism. Overcoming terrorism as an escalating global problem requires the collective efforts of the majority of states and peoples on our planet, the entire world community.

Fourthly, the connection between the modern phenomenon of terrorism and other pressing global problems of our time is becoming increasingly clear and visible. At present, the problem of terrorism should be considered as an important element of the entire complex of universal, global problems.

Let us consider in more detail the most important of them.

First of all, you should pay attention to the fact that the problem of terrorism is connected with the main spheres of life of the world community and societies of individual countries: politics, national relations, religion, ecology, criminal communities, etc. This connection is reflected in the existence of various types of terrorism, which include: political, nationalist, religious, criminal and environmental terrorism.

Members of groups carrying out political terror set as their task the achievement of political, social or economic changes within a particular state, as well as the undermining of interstate relations and international law and order. Nationalist (or as it is also called national, ethnic or separatist) terrorism pursues the goals of solving the national question, which has recently become increasingly separatist aspirations in various multi-ethnic states.

The religious type of terrorism is caused by attempts by armed groups professing one or another religion to fight against a state dominated by another religion or another religious trend. Criminal terrorism is formed on the basis of any criminal business (drug trafficking, illegal arms trafficking, smuggling, etc.) with the aim of creating chaos and tension in the conditions of which it is most likely to receive excess profits. Environmental terrorism is carried out by groups that use violent methods in general against scientific and technological progress and pollution environment, killing animals and building nuclear facilities.

Another distinctive feature of the global problem of terrorism is the significant influence on it of international criminal communities, certain political forces and some states. This influence undoubtedly leads to an aggravation of the problem under consideration.

In the modern world, there are manifestations of state terrorism associated with attempts to eliminate heads of foreign states and other politicians; with actions aimed at overthrowing the governments of foreign countries; creating panic among the population of foreign countries, etc.

Terrorism is now an integral part of the proliferation of transnational criminal organizations supported by corrupt government officials and politicians. Thus, in the widely known work of English scientists “Global Transformations” it is noted: “There are also negative forms of international organizations, such as terrorist and criminal organizations. Despite the centuries-long conflict between smugglers and authorities, recent years The growth of transnational criminal organizations is associated with the drug trade (now, according to experts, its annual turnover is over $300 billion) and the widespread prevalence of organized crime. Addressing these issues has become a major challenge for governments and police forces around the world."

Another specific feature of the global problem of terrorism is its difficulty in predicting. In many cases, the subjects of terrorism are mentally unstable people and overly ambitious politicians. Terrorism is often seen as a way to achieve goals on the world stage and in international relations that cannot be achieved by any other methods. In modern conditions, the forms of terrorist activity are becoming more and more complex, and are increasingly in conflict with universal human values ​​and the logic of world development.

Thus, the problem of terrorism poses a real planetary threat to the world community. This problem has its own specificity, which distinguishes it from other universal human difficulties. However, the problem of terrorism is closely interconnected with most of the global problems of modern international relations. It can be considered one of the most pressing global problems of our days.

Under these conditions, the global problem of terrorism cannot be considered only as an independent phenomenon. She started to become important component a more general military-political global problem related to fundamental issues of war and peace, on the solution of which the further existence of human civilization depends.

2.2. Possible methods of overcoming the main problem of our time

Humanism as a value basis for solving the problem of terrorism

The solution to the global problem of our time - terrorism - is common

In philosophical literature there are various
interpretation of the concept of “humanism”. Historically, humanism was most often understood as a system of value systems aimed at satisfying human needs. In this sense, the concept of “humanism” coincided in its meaning with the concept of “humanity”, “philanthropy”.
Humanism as a certain system of value orientations and attitudes, taken to its logical conclusion, receives the meaning of a social ideal. With this approach, man is seen as the highest goal social development, during which the creation of the necessary conditions is ensured for the full realization of all its potential, the achievement of harmony in the socio-economic and spiritual sphere of life, the highest flourishing of a specific human personality. In other words, the highest goal
humanity obviously lies in achieving complete
implementation of the principles of humanism as the triumph of the human principle. Humanism in this sense should not be understood one-sidedly, only as the full realization of the human principle in the spiritual sphere, moral relations. The humanistic principle is inextricably linked
with all spheres of people’s lives, including social production and the system of production relations, since without satisfying the material needs of society and man, there can be no talk of any spiritual and moral development of the individual.

Along with these approaches, modern philosophical literature most often emphasizes that the implementation of the principles of humanism means the manifestation of a universal principle. Humanism, in accordance with this approach, is defined as a system of ideas and values ​​that affirm the universal significance of human existence in general and the individual in particular. The universal in this approach is considered as something significant not for some limited circle of people (social group, class, party, state or coalition of states), but as something that matters for all of humanity. These can be certain specific values ​​and material objects, on a sufficient quantity of which the existence of humanity depends. Or, conversely,
excess of such objects, lack of proper control over
they pose a threat to humanity. Thus, the global problems of our time are awareness of the tragic prospects for humanity in the face of the nuclear threat, the threat of starvation and environmental disaster- force humanity to overcome the narrow horizon of local, particular, relative values ​​and turn to the search for universal human values. Humanity is driven to this not only by the desire for survival, the instinct of self-preservation, but also by a deep need
person in an organic connection with other people, which
has now become more conscious and more urgent, which is expressed in such a still very little explored phenomenon as the growth of planetary consciousness. Invariably more high level, while preserving the wealth of individual self-expression, humanity seems to be turning to the times when the individual was seen not only as a representative of a clan, tribe, community, but as a representative of the entire human race. This circle of universal human values ​​is a consequence of historical necessity; it is mundane in nature and contributes only to the external unification of people in the struggle for survival. However, along with this meaning, the term “universal human values” has a broader character. Universal human values ​​are considered as transcendental values.

Transcendental values are understood as limiting, historically not localizable. They belong to all peoples to one degree or another, but not all are expressed in the same way. This expression depends on the degree of metaphysicality of the mentality of the people, their aspiration towards something absolute, transcendental, which includes an unclear element and requires special respect and piety. These values ​​are determined by the peculiarities of the cultural and historical development of a particular country, its religious traditions, and the type of civilization. So, for example, the metaphysical nature latently present in the consciousness of Russians found its expression
in a universal feeling, a messianic idea designed to unite the disintegrated branches of universal human progress. Hence the attractiveness of the idea of ​​communism, which stirred the consciousness of the Russian people, and, in fact, turned the whole social life Russia.

Transcendental values ​​have a deep inner meaning, hidden from the external gaze, which, as a rule, is not captured, because its comprehension presupposes an ascent to the very origins of the fundamental tradition, which retains its spiritual content. Then the values
appear not simply as external moral rules,
but as objects of direct internal experience, that is, at their basis
It turns out, ultimately, the idea of ​​God as the embodiment of goodness, love, beauty, truth and justice. God is the standard by which human affairs are measured.

A person’s aspiration for some other, higher activity is an important and ineradicable psychological need that gives impetus to activity and the development of creativity, without which no great achievements are possible. “The greatest beauty that is achieved in this world,” wrote
N.A. Berdyaev, - is connected not with the fact that humanity set itself purely earthly goals in this reality, but with the fact that it
set goals beyond this world . The impulse that led humanity to another world was embodied in this world in
the only possible, highest beauty for him, which
always has a symbolic nature, not a realistic one."

Universal human values ​​are an ideal, a symbol, a model, a regulatory idea, and as such they have the right to occupy an appropriate place in our consciousness and worldview. In this sense, universal human values ​​are not just a fiction, an empty dream; behind them lies the experience of humanity, its potential and aspirations. The modern era has not only highlighted the important role of universal human values, but also shown their contradictions and dynamics, and in different interrelated plans. We are talking about contradictions in the very nature of universal human values, about contradictions between them and specific historical
phenomena of heterogeneity in the system of these values.

The concept of universal human values ​​as a regulatory idea, ideal, model is opposed by the idea that these values, as such, are contradictory in nature and cannot be different, since the same thing is universal. The same scale is applied to various, including mutually exclusive, phenomena. So, further, the highest motives in the name of goodness can turn into evil for many people and everything
society, when they are equally, by the same measure
extend to those who are simply deaf to them, and use the call to goodness for selfish purposes, to cause damage to specific people and the entire society.

And yet, the inconsistency of universal human values ​​has not led in history to a refusal to present them as an integral, consistent ideal, that is, to the recognition of their relative nature, relativization. In
Much of this did not happen because various religions have always resisted the relativization of values. In the religious interpretation, universal human values ​​are interpreted as values ​​that have a divine nature. This cleared them of internal contradictions, although
to a certain extent, focused attention on the existence of a contradiction between them and earthly reality.

Consolidation of international forces

People's worldview is manifested not only in what they know about the world, but also in how they interpret this information, what conclusions they draw, and how they act. Therefore, speaking about the urgent need for the whole world to urgently solve global problems, one cannot help but pay attention to the fact that, having certain successes in theory and some practical results, humanity has not yet stopped the negative trends in world development. There is still no proper consolidation international forces, their coordinated, targeted and, most importantly, effective actions that would be adequate to the identified danger. Why and what prevents this? Is it possible to coordinate actions in such a heterogeneous and contradictory world as it has become at the end of the second millennium? And if possible, then on what basis? These are the main questions that are being addressed by public thought today and, not least, philosophy.

Historical experience shows that the rapprochement of different peoples in the best possible way occurs where their interests coincide, and the better they are conscious, the more tangible the result of integration. On this basis, various difficulties are confidently overcome, trade is successfully developing, economic, political, and cultural ties are strengthening, unthinkable without mutual understanding and coordination in actions.

Usually the greatest difficulties that have to be overcome on this path are associated with ideological conservatism, established ways of thinking, and traditions. They tend to change, but this happens for a very long time, with great difficulty and, as a rule, under the pressure of external or internal circumstances. External, for example, are: the aggravation of the environmental crisis, the consequences of the “population explosion”, the danger of war and other global problems, which, as we have already noted, have significantly changed not only the living conditions of people, but have already influenced their consciousness. Internal ones are associated with interest, the subjective, personal beginning of a person, which is reflected in the well-known expression “if geometric axioms affected the interests of people, they would be refuted.” This circumstance must certainly be taken into account if trying to understand why the severity of environmental problems does not decrease, at least in those cases where there are necessary conditions and sufficient grounds for this.

Conclusion: Recently, the problem of terrorism has become one of the most pressing global problems of our time.

The problem of terrorism has many common features characteristic of other universal problems, such as the planetary scale of manifestation; great sharpness; negative dynamism, when the negative impact on the life of humanity increases; need for an urgent solution, etc. At the same time, the global problem of terrorism also has specific, characteristic features.


the work of all humanity. Humanity must work out effective forms cooperation that would allow all countries to act together, despite differences in socio-political, religious, ethnic and other ideological orientations. And for this it must be based on certain basic value orientations. Many modern philosophers rightly believe that such basic orientations can be the values ​​of humanism.

Conclusion

As a result of the work performed, the following conclusions can be drawn.

Now, in the 21st century, humanity is closely faced with the most acute global problems that threaten the very existence of civilization and even life itself on our planet. The term “global” itself originates from the Latin word “globe”, that is, Earth, globe, and since the late 60s of the 20th century it has become widespread to designate the most important and urgent planetary problems of the modern era, affecting humanity as a whole. .

Philosophy plays a significant role in solving global problems and the philosophical approach involves considering global problems in their unity, integrity and interconnection from the point of view of their social significance and social conditionality.

Recently, the problem of terrorism has become one of the most pressing global problems of our time.

The problem of terrorism has many common features characteristic of other universal problems, such as the planetary scale of manifestation; great sharpness; negative dynamism, when the negative impact on the life of humanity increases; need for an urgent solution, etc. At the same time, the global problem of terrorism also has specific, characteristic features.

The solution to the global problem of terrorism is a common one
the work of all humanity. Humanity must develop effective forms of cooperation that would allow all countries to act together, despite differences in socio-political, religious, ethnic and other ideological orientations. And for this it must be based on certain basic value orientations. Many modern philosophers rightly believe that such basic orientations can be the values ​​of humanism.

References

1. Held D., McGrew A., Goldblatt D., Perraton J. Global Transformations. Politics, Economics and Culture. Oxford, 2009. P. 58.

2. Berdyaev N. A. The meaning of history. - M.: Mysl, 1990. - pp. 157-158.

3. Vatin, I.V. Philosophy: textbook for universities. - Rostov n/d: Phoenix, 2004 .- 576 p.

4. Gavrilin Yu.V., Smirnov L.V. Modern terrorism: essence, typology, problems of counteraction. Study guide. – M.: Book World, 2003. – 66 p.

5. Kikel P.V. Philosophy. – M.: Asar, 2008. – 429 p.

6. Kostin, A. I. Ecopolitical science and global studies. - M.: Aspect-Press, 2009. – 170 p.

7. Nikitaev V.V. Body of terror. On the problem of the theory of terrorism // “Polygnosis”. – 2010, No. 3. – P.63.

8. Sosnin V.A., Nestik T.A. Modern terrorism. Socio-psychological analysis. – M.: Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2008. –240 p.

9. Social diseases of our time // “Vestnik” Russian society" - 2009, No. 4. – P. 66.

10. Turaev V.A. Global problems of our time: Textbook for universities. – M.: Europe, 2005. – 269 p.

Related articles