Alexander Friedman's opening briefly. Outstanding Matmekhovites

Who invented modern physics? From Galileo's pendulum to quantum gravity Gorelik Gennady Efimovich

Alexander Friedman: “The Universe does not stand still”

In the spring of 1922, an appeal “To the physicists of Germany” appeared in the main physics journal of that time, Zeitschrift für Physik. The board of the German Physical Society reported on the difficult situation of colleagues in Russia, who had not received German journals since the beginning of the war. Since German-speaking physics was in the lead at that time, we were talking about a severe information famine. German physicists were asked for publications recent years for forwarding to Petrograd.

In the same magazine, twenty-five pages below, there is an article received from Petrograd and contradicting the call for help. The name of the author - Alexander Friedman - was unknown to physicists, but the article with the title “On the curvature of space” claimed a lot. The author argued that the solutions of Einstein and de Sitter, published five years earlier, were not the only possible ones, but only very special cases, and that density, constant throughout space, does not have to be constant in time. It was in this article that the “expansion of the Universe” was first mentioned. It will become an astronomical fact seven years later; it remains to be measured and calculated how many billions of years the expansion lasted and what the distance to the cosmic horizon was, but the horizon of science was expanded in 1922 by 34-year-old Alexander Friedman.

Alexander Fridman

If, having the courage, we liken the Universe to a pendulum, then the solutions to the cosmological problem obtained by Einstein and de Sitter can be compared to the positions of the pendulum at rest. There are two such positions: when the pendulum is simply hanging and when it is standing “upside down”. And Friedman discovered that the universal pendulum does not have to rest at all; it is much more natural for it to move. And he calculated the law of motion based on Einstein’s equations. At the same time, he showed that motion is possible even if the cosmological constant is equal to zero. The Universe can expand and contract depending on its density and speed at a certain moment. So,

Let us now liken the Universe to a rubber ball, remembering the essence of Einstein’s theory of gravity - the connection between the curvature of space-time and the state of matter. Einstein, one might say, discovered how the radius of a ball is related to the density and elasticity of rubber. He started with a ball whose radius is constant.

Simplifying a problem is one of the theorist's main tools. In the darkness of ignorance, people sometimes look for the key under a lamppost only because it is impossible to look in other places. Oddly enough, such searches are successful. Even the author of the equations cannot solve complex equations for an arbitrary case. Einstein started with the simplest case - with the most homogeneous geometry, although the observations of astronomers in 1917 did not indicate the homogeneity of matter in the Universe.

But his second assumption - about the immobility of the ball - looked as obvious as the constancy of the starry sky. Only against the background of fixed stars were astronomers able to study the movement of planets, and physicists to find the laws governing this movement. And finally, the eternity of the Universe habitually, in the name of science, opposed the religious idea of ​​​​the creation of the world.

Friedman raised his hand to this axiom.

Let's return to the rubber, or more precisely to the Riemannian, ball of the Universe, which Einstein picked up in 1917. Having made his simplifying assumptions, Einstein was saddened to discover that in fact there was no ball in his hands, there were only ethereal axioms. He discovered that the gravity equations he had worked through two years ago did not have the expected solution! Any child who knew that real life rubber ball starts when you inflate it. But Einstein - not without reason a great physicist - came up with this himself. The cosmological constant he added to the equations became the air whose elasticity balanced the elasticity of the universal ball.

Having become acquainted with Einstein's cosmology, Friedman appreciated the enormity of the posed physical problem, but its mathematical solution raised doubts in him. Of course, the pendulum can be at rest, but this is only special case its general oscillatory motion. Or in the language of mathematics: a differential equation, like Einstein’s equation of gravity, usually has a whole class of solutions depending on the initial conditions.

In his article, Friedman showed how spherical space-time changes in accordance with its “elasticity”, defined by Einstein’s equation. In one of possible solutions The radius of the Universe increased, starting from zero, to a certain maximum value, and then decreased again to zero. What is a sphere of zero radius? Nothing! And Friedman wrote:

Using an obvious analogy, we will call the period of time during which the radius of curvature from 0 reached R 0 , time elapsed since the creation of the world.

It’s easy for a mathematician to say so, but for the physicist Einstein the result was so strange that... he didn’t believe him, found an imaginary error in the calculations and reported it to a short note in the same magazine. Only after receiving a letter from Friedman and doing the calculations again, Einstein recognized the results of his Russian colleague and in the next note called them “shedding new light” on the cosmological problem. For historians, Einstein's mistake sheds light on the scope of Friedman's work.

Einstein about the work of A. Friedman

Comment on the work of A. Friedman “On the curvature of space” (09/18/1922)

...The results regarding the dynamic world contained in the mentioned work seem dubious to me... In reality, the solution indicated in it does not satisfy the field equations. The significance of this work lies in the fact that it proves the constancy of the radius of the world over time...

To the work of A. Friedman “On the curvature of space” (05/31/1923)

In a previous post I criticized the above work. However, my criticism, as I saw from Friedman's letter, was based on an error in calculations. I think Friedman's results are correct and shed new light. It turns out that the field equations allow, along with static ones, also dynamic (time-varying) solutions for the structure of space.

Today’s student can go through Friedman’s two-page calculations and think skeptically: “Well, what did he actually do?!” I solved the equation, that's all! This is how schoolchildren solve equations. Yes, Einstein's equations are more complex than quadratic equations, but Friedman is not a schoolboy either. Einstein found one “root” of his equations, Friedman found the rest.”

So, maybe the conversation about the greatness of Friedman’s work is an echo of those years when the guardians of Russian glory sought out domestic pioneers at any cost? No, if only because those same guardians tried to forget about the domestic contribution to cosmology, declared a servant of “clergy”, in the language Soviet ideology. If Friedman himself wrote about the “creation of the world,” then the guardians of the state atheistic religion could not allow such freedom of speech. Cosmology in the USSR was closed in 1938 and allowed only after Stalin's death.

Formulas in physical work live their own lives. This is both good and not so good. Good, because scientific prejudices and unnecessary interpretations are more easily separated from formulas. But, on the other hand, looking at formulas written many years ago, it is difficult to understand the meaning that was put into them when they appeared.

Friedman's work cannot be called just another cosmological solution that was put on a shelf next to Einstein's first solution. Friedman discovered the depth of the cosmological problem by discovering that change is generic property Universe. Thus, the concept of evolution was extended to the most comprehensive object. In addition, a question arose that still does not have a convincing answer: how does the multiplicity of cosmological solutions to the theory of gravity relate to the fundamental uniqueness of the Universe itself?

Was Friedman's result a fluke or a reward for courage?

First scientific work he did, while still a high school student, in pure mathematics - in number theory. After graduating from the mathematics department of the university, he studied dynamic meteorology - the science of the most chaotic processes in the sublunar world, simply put, weather prediction. The mathematics of his science resembled the mathematics of Einstein's theory of gravity. And most importantly, it was easier for him, a mathematician, to resist the authority of the great physicist and doubt his results.

So, Friedman is a pure mathematician? Not only that. While still a student, he participated in the “Circle new physics"under the leadership of Paul Ehrenfest, who was then living in Russia, a friend of Einstein.

History has taken care of other favorable circumstances. During the Civil War, due to a shortage of teachers, Friedman taught courses in physics and Riemannian geometry. And in 1920, fate brought him together with Vsevolod Fredericks. This Russian physicist world war I found it in Germany. The sad fate of a subject of an enemy power would have awaited him, if not for the intercession of Hilbert, the famous German mathematician. As a result, Fredericks became his assistant for several years - just when the creation of the theory of gravity was being completed and when Einstein came to Hilbert to discuss his theory. Fredericks witnessed all this.

Even before 1922, German physicists tried to help their colleagues in Russia. Ehrenfest was especially concerned about this. In the summer of 1920, his letter arrived in Petrograd, the first after a many-year break. In August 1920, Friedman replied to Ehrenfest that he was studying the theory of relativity and was going to work on the theory of gravity.

There was already a boom in the world around the new theory - after the deflection of light rays from distant stars, predicted by Einstein, was confirmed. Popular brochures about the new theory began to appear, including a book by Einstein himself. In the author's preface to the Russian translation, published in Berlin in the fall of 1920, we read:

More than ever, in these troubled times we should care about everything that can bring people together different languages and nations. From this point of view, it is especially important to promote a lively exchange of artistic and scientific works even under the current difficult circumstances. Therefore, I am especially pleased that my little book appears in Russian.

The two-way exchange of physical and mathematical ideas in cosmology occurred surprisingly quickly.

So who was the founder of dynamic cosmology - a mathematician or a physicist? A person who knew him well said about Friedman better than anyone else: “A mathematician by education and talent, both in his youth and in his mature years he was eager to apply the mathematical apparatus to the study of nature.”

To apply mathematics to such a unique volume as the Universe requires courage, which is not taught in either mathematics or physics departments. She either exists or she doesn’t. Friedman's courage is visible to the naked eye: he voluntarily went to the front - in aviation, and being already a professor (and the author of a new cosmology), he participated in a record-breaking balloon flight.

So, talent, knowledge and courage. This combination is quite worthy of a reward, which is sometimes called luck, sometimes - favorable historical circumstances. But Friedman was not destined to live to see the scale of his discovery become clear. Talented and brave man died at 37 from typhoid fever.

Seven years later, in the diary of Academician V.I. Vernadsky's entry appeared:

Conversation with Verigo about A.A. Friedman. He died early, perhaps a brilliant scientist, which B.B. described to me extremely highly? Golitsyn in 1915 and then I paid attention to him. And now - in connection with my current work and his idea of ​​\u200b\u200bthe expanding pulsating Universe - I read what was available to me. Clear, deep thought of a widely educated, God-given person. According to Verigo - his comrade and friend - it was charming personality, wonderful comrade. He got along with him at the front. At the beginning of the Bolshevik rule, Friedman and Tamarkin, his friend, but much lighter than him, were expelled from the University. At one time Fridman wanted to escape with Tamarkin: maybe he would have survived?

After the German physicist, the Dutch astronomer and the Russian mathematician, the next important contributions to cosmology were made by American astronomers.

This text is an introductory fragment. From the book Newest book facts. Volume 3 [Physics, chemistry and technology. History and archaeology. Miscellaneous] author Kondrashov Anatoly Pavlovich

From the book Interesting about astronomy author Tomilin Anatoly Nikolaevich

From the book What is the theory of relativity author Landau Lev Davidovich

From the book Who Invented Modern Physics? From Galileo's pendulum to quantum gravity author Gorelik Gennady Efimovich

From the book Tweets about the Universe by Chaun Marcus

From the book Who the Apple Fell On author Kesselman Vladimir Samuilovich

From the book Epoch and Personality. Physicists. Essays and memoirs author Feinberg Evgeny Lvovich

From the author's book

From the author's book

Chapter two “...And it stands on three pillars...” Faith is the extrapolation of truth through authority, the unsubstantiated perception of verbal information as

From the author's book

From the author's book

How much does a gram of light cost? The increase in body mass is closely related to the work done on it: it is proportional to the work that is needed to set the body in motion. In this case, there is no need to spend work only on setting the body in motion. Any

From the author's book

Alexander Friedman: “The Universe does not stand still” In the spring of 1922, an appeal “To the physicists of Germany” appeared in the main physics journal of that time, Zeitschrift für Physik. The Board of the German Physical Society reported on the difficult situation of colleagues in Russia, who

From the author's book

108. Could life exist elsewhere in the solar system? Space is harsh. Vacuum, cold and heat, deadly ultraviolet (UV) radiation and high energy particles are all harmful to living cells. If it is too hot, complex molecules break down, and if

From the author's book

An experience that should not be repeated “I want to tell you a new and terrible experience, which I advise you not to repeat yourself,” wrote the Dutch physicist van Musschenbroeck to the Parisian physicist Reaumur and further reported that when he took left hand glass jar with electrified

The world is not fully created: the heavens are always being updated, astronomers are always adding new ones to the old stars. If I discovered a star, I would call it Friedman - better means I can’t find it to make everything clearer.

Friedman! Until now, he is an inhabitant of only a few bookshelves - an amateur mathematician, a young meteorologist and a military aviator on the German front somewhere, and later - the organizer of the University of Perm at the dawn Soviet power. Member of Osoaviakhim. Having caught typhus in the Crimea, unfortunately, he did not return from Crimea. Died. And they forgot about him. Only a quarter of a century later they remembered the man and seemed to revive him: “Young, full of boldness, he did not think without ideas. It is a fact that in some ways he went further than Einstein himself: sensing the inconstancy of forms in this hurricane world, he saw galaxies scattering in the curvature of space.” – “Expansion of the Universe? We need to figure this out!”

They begin to bicker.

But the fact is undeniable: this Friedman was a scientist with a very enviable future. Oh, shine a new star above the horizon, Friedman!

Some inaccuracies do not at all spoil the poems of Leonid Martynov, dedicated to the mathematician, physicist, meteorologist Alexander Alexandrovich Fridman, who succeeded despite short life, leave a noticeable mark on world science.

Academician P. L. Kapitsa argued that Friedman was one of the best Russian scientists. “If it had not been for his death from typhoid fever at the age of 37... he certainly would have done much more in physics and mathematics and would have achieved the highest academic ranks. At a young age, he was already a professor and was world famous among specialists in the theory of relativity and meteorology. In the 1920s, while in Leningrad, I often heard reviews of Friedman as an outstanding scientist from professors Krutkov, Fredericks, and Bursian.”

While still a high school student, Friedman (together with Ya. D. Tumarkin) published two short articles on number theory. Both received an approving review from the famous mathematician D. Hilbert. Friedman’s widow wrote: “...In childhood, the most severe punishment, which pacified his rebellious temper: he was left without an arithmetic lesson, and he remained that way for the rest of his life. While still a student he published several mathematical studies; one of them was awarded a Gold Medal from the Faculty of Physics and Mathematics.” The widow was referring to work on number theory - again done with Tumarkin.

In 1910, Friedman graduated from St. Petersburg University and was retained at the mathematics department to prepare for a professorship. At the same time, he taught classes in higher mathematics at the Institute of Railways and the Mining Institute. For many years, Friedman maintained a trusting relationship with his teacher, Academician Steklov. The correspondence of scientists is of undoubted value, since it allows not only to see their interests, but also to understand the atmosphere that reigned in mathematics of that era.

“Dear Vladimir Andreevich,” Friedman wrote in 1911, “I had to remember the saying that you spoke about this spring: “Do as you know, you will regret it anyway.”

The fact is that I decided to get married.

I already told you in general outline about his bride. She is taking a course (mathematics); her name is Ekaterina Petrovna Dorofeeva; a little older than me; I think that marriage will not have an adverse effect on my studies...”

In the same letter, Friedman reported:

“...Our classes are with Yak. Dove. (with Yakov Davidovich Tamarkin, a student of V.A. Steklov and friend of Friedman) are going, it seems, quite favorably. They, of course, consist solely of reading the courses and articles recommended by you for the master's exam. We have already finished hydrodynamics and are starting to study the theory of elasticity. We have several questions, but it’s better to find out when we meet with you.”

In 1913, Friedman passed the exams for a master's degree in pure and applied mathematics. Having become interested in mathematical aerology, he got a job at the Aerological Observatory in the city of Pavlovsk, but at the end of the summer of 1914 the First World War began. Friedman volunteered to join an aviation detachment operating on the Northern Front. Starting as a private, he quickly rose to the rank of corporal, and in the summer of 1915 he received his first officer rank- ensign. Friedman not only established air navigation and aerological services on the Northern Front, but also took part in combat missions more than once as an observer pilot.

“...My life flows quite smoothly,” he wrote to Steklov on February 5, 1915, “except for such accidents as: the explosion of shrapnel at 20 steps, the explosion of the fuse of an Austrian bomb in half a step, which ended almost safely for me, and falling on my face and head that ended in a rupture upper lip and headaches. But, of course, you get used to all this, especially when you see things around you that are a thousand times heavier...”

After the October Revolution, Friedman returned to teaching.

In 1918, he was given the position of extraordinary professor at the department of theoretical mathematics of the young Perm University.

Friedman taught at Perm University for two years.

Only in 1920 did he return to Petrograd.

In a hungry, cold capital, a young scientist got a job at the Main Physical Observatory. At the same time, he gave lectures at several universities, including Petrograd University. In 1922 Friedman brought out general equation to determine the speed vortex, which later became fundamental in the theory of weather forecasting. At the Naval Academy, he gave a course of lectures “Experience in the hydromechanics of a compressible fluid,” solving a complex problem about the movement of a liquid or gas at very high speeds, when the liquid or gas cannot in principle be considered ideal and their compressibility must be taken into account. In those same years, together with L.V. Keller, he indicated a system of characteristics of the structure of a turbulent flow and constructed a closed system of equations, connecting the pulsations of speed and pressure at two points of the flow at different times. In 1925, for research purposes, he ascended in a balloon with the famous Soviet stratonaut P. Fedoseenko to a record height for that time - 7.4 kilometers.

Particular attention was drawn to Friedman's two small works on cosmology - “On the Curvature of Space” (1922), and “On the Possibility of a World with Constant Negative Curvature” (1924), published in the Berlin Physical Journal. In these works Friedman showed that geometric properties The universe on a large scale must change dramatically over time, that is, all such changes must be of the nature of “expansion” or “compression.” A few years later, the American astronomer Hubble actually discovered the effect of the recession of galaxies - a consequence of the expansion of the Universe.

Before Friedman’s work, the belief in a static Universe was so great that even Einstein, when developing the general theory of relativity, introduced into his equations the so-called cosmological constant - a kind of “anti-gravity” force, which, unlike other forces, was not generated by any physical source , but was embedded in the very structure of space-time.

On September 18, 1922, Einstein published “Remarks on the work of A. Friedman “On the curvature of space.” The summary of this remark read: “...The results regarding the non-stationary world contained in the mentioned work seem to me suspicious.” However, already on May 31, 1923, having understood the work of the Russian scientist, Einstein hastened to announce: “... In the previous note, I criticized Friedman’s work. However, my criticism, as I became convinced... was based on an error in calculations. I think Friedman's results are correct."

Friedman proved that the matter of the Universe does not necessarily have to be at rest. The Universe cannot be stationary, he believed. The universe must either expand or contract.

In arguing this, Friedman proceeded from two assumptions.

Firstly, he pointed out, the Universe looks absolutely the same everywhere, no matter in what direction we observe it, and, secondly, this statement always remains valid, no matter from what place we observe the Universe.

The models considered by Friedman said that at some point in time in the past, naturally - cosmic time, that is, billions and billions of years distant from us (time that the human brain finds it difficult to perceive as something real), the distance between all galaxies should was equal to zero. At this moment (usually called Big bang) the density of the Universe and the curvature of space should have been infinite. Since mathematicians cannot actually handle infinitely large quantities, this meant that, according to general relativity, there had to be a point in the Universe at which none of the laws of that theory itself could apply.

Such a point is called singular.

Analyzing the concept of singularity, the French mathematician Lemaitre proposed calling the state of such a high concentration of matter a “primary atom.” He wrote: “The word “atom” should be understood here in its original form, Greek meaning. An atom is something so simple that nothing can be said about it and not a single question can be asked about it. Here we have a completely incomprehensible beginning. Only when the atom decayed into large number fragments, filling the space of a small but not exactly zero radius, physical concepts began to take on meaning."

Friedman's work caused a lot of unrest among physicists.

The idea that time once had a beginning did not appeal to many, wrote American astrophysicist Hawking. But I didn’t like this idea precisely because it contained some, albeit vague, hint of the intervention of divine forces. It is no coincidence that the Big Bang model was grasped by catholic church. In 1951, the Pope officially declared that the Big Bang model was fully consistent with the Bible.

Cosmologist W. Bonnor commented on this fact:

“Some scientists identified the singularity with God and thought that at that moment the universe was born. It seems to me highly inappropriate to force God to solve our scientific problems. There is no place for such supernatural intervention in science. And anyone who believes in God and associates a singularity in differential equations with him risks losing the need for him when mathematics improves.”

“The view I take is that the universe has an unlimited past and future. This may seem as puzzling as the assumption that her story is finite. However, in scientific terms, this point of view is a methodological foundation, and nothing else. Science should not arbitrarily accept hypotheses that limit the scope of its research.”

“Sometimes they say,” wrote Academician Kapitsa, “that Friedman did not really believe in his own theory and treated it only as a mathematical curiosity. He allegedly said that his job was to solve equations, and other specialists—physicists—should understand the physical meaning of the solutions. This ironic statement about his work by a witty man cannot change our high appreciation of his discovery. Even if Friedman was not sure that the expansion of the Universe, resulting from his mathematical calculations, exists in nature, this in no way detracts from his scientific merit. Let us recall, for example, Dirac’s theoretical prediction of the positron. Dirac also did not believe in the real existence of the positron and treated his calculations as a purely mathematical achievement, convenient for describing certain processes. But the positron was discovered, and Dirac, without even realizing it, turned out to be a prophet. No one is trying to diminish his contribution to science because he himself did not believe in his prophecy.”

An obituary written by Friedman's widow said:

“Excelsior (above) was the motto of his life.

He was tormented by a thirst for knowledge.

Having chosen mechanics, this paradise of mathematical sciences (according to Leonardo da Vinci), he could not limit himself to it and sought and found new branches, studied deeply, in detail and was forever tormented by the insufficiency of his knowledge. “No, I’m ignorant, I don’t know anything, I need to sleep even less, not do anything extraneous, since this whole so-called life is a complete waste of time.” He tormented himself deliberately, because he saw that he did not have enough time to embrace with his gaze the wide horizons that opened up to him while studying new science. Always ready to modestly learn from anyone who knew more than him, he was aware that in his work he was following new paths, difficult, unexplored by anyone, and he loved to quote the words of Dante: “The waters that I am entering have never been crossed by anyone.”

In 1931, posthumously, Friedman's research was awarded the. V.I. Lenin.


| |

Speech at the session of the Department of Physical and Mathematical Sciences of the USSR Academy of Sciences, dedicated to the 75th anniversary of the birth of A. A. Friedman


Alexander Friedman is one of our best scientists. If it had not been for his death from typhoid fever at the age of 37, he would still be with us today. Of course, he would have done much more in physics and mathematics and would have achieved the highest academic ranks. At a young age, he was already a professor and was world famous among specialists in the theory of relativity and meteorology. In the 1920s, while in Leningrad, I often heard reviews of Friedman as an outstanding scientist from professors Krutkov, Fredericks, and Bursian.

Friedman made one of the most significant theoretical discoveries in astronomy - he predicted the expansion of the Universe.

From Friedman's solution of Einstein's cosmological equations, the possibility of changing the radius of curvature of our world over time followed. A few years after the publication of Friedman's work, the American astronomer Hubble discovered the recession of galaxies - a consequence of the expansion of the Universe. Thus, Friedman “at the tip of his pen” discovered an amazing phenomenon on a cosmic scale.

In this regard, it is sometimes said that Friedman did not really believe in his own theory and treated it only as a mathematical curiosity. He allegedly said that his job was to solve equations, and other specialists - physicists - should understand the physical meaning of the solutions.

This ironic statement about his work by a witty man cannot change our high appreciation of his discovery. Even if Friedman was not sure that the expansion of the Universe, resulting from his mathematical calculations, exists in nature, this in no way detracts from his scientific merit. Let us recall, for example, Dirac’s theoretical prediction of the positron. Dirac also did not believe in the real existence of the positron and treated his calculations as a purely mathematical achievement, convenient for describing certain processes. But the positron was discovered, and Dirac, without even realizing it, turned out to be a prophet. No one is trying to downplay his contribution to science because he himself did not believe in his prophecy.

Dirac later predicted the existence of individual magnetic poles, which were not found, although at one time Fermi thought that they could really exist, but this was a mistake. It is unknown whether he believed that they would be found. But if this happens, scientists will give Dirac credit for the power of his theory.

Friedman did not live to see his calculations confirmed by direct observation. But we now know that he was right. And we are obliged to give a fair assessment of the remarkable result of this scientist.

Friedman's name has so far been in undeserved oblivion. This is unfair and needs to be corrected. We must perpetuate this name. After all, Friedman is one of the pioneers of Soviet physics, a scientist who made a great contribution to domestic and world science.

FRIEDMAN, ALEXANDER ALEKSANDROVICH(1888–1925), Russian and Soviet mathematician and geophysicist, creator of the theory of the non-stationary Universe. Born June 16, 1888 in St. Petersburg. In school and student years was interested in astronomy. In 1906 he published his first math work in one of the leading scientific journals in Germany “Mathematical Annals” (“Mathematische Annalen”). In 1906 he entered the mathematical department of the Faculty of Physics and Mathematics of St. Petersburg University, from which he graduated in 1910. He was retained at the department of pure and applied mathematics to prepare for the professorship. Until the spring of 1913, Friedman studied mathematics - he led practical classes at the Institute of Railway Engineers, and lectured at the Mining Institute. In 1913 he entered the Aerological Observatory in Pavlovsk near St. Petersburg and began to study dynamic meteorology (now this field of science is called geophysical hydrodynamics). In the spring of 1914, he was sent on a business trip to Leipzig, where at that time the famous Norwegian meteorologist Wilhelm Freeman Koren Bjerknes (1862–1951), the creator of the theory of fronts in the atmosphere, lived. In the summer of the same year, Friedman flew on airships, taking part in preparations for the observation solar eclipse in August 1914.

With the outbreak of World War I, Friedman volunteered to join an aviation detachment. In 1914–1917 he participated in the organization of air navigation and aerological services on the Northern and other fronts. Participated as an observer in combat missions.

In 1918–1920 – professor at Perm University. From 1920 he worked at the Main Physical Observatory (from 1924 the Main Geophysical Observatory named after A.I. Voeikov), at the same time from 1920 he taught in various educational institutions Petrograd. From 1923 – editor-in-chief"Journal of Geophysics and Meteorology". Shortly before his death, he was appointed director of the Main Geophysical Observatory.

Friedman's main works are devoted to the problems of dynamic meteorology (theory atmospheric vortices and wind gustiness, theory of discontinuities in the atmosphere, atmospheric turbulence), hydrodynamics of compressible fluid, atmospheric physics and relativistic cosmology. In July 1925, for scientific purposes, he flew in a balloon together with the pilot P.F. Fedoseenko, reaching a record altitude of 7400 m at that time. Friedman was one of the first to master the mathematical apparatus of Einstein’s theory of gravity and began teaching a course in tensor calculus at the university as an introductory part to course of general theory of relativity. His book was published in 1923 The world as space and time(reissued in 1965), which introduced general public with new physics.

Friedman predicted the expansion of the Universe. The first non-static solutions of Einstein's equations obtained by him in 1922–1924 while studying relativistic models of the Universe laid the foundation for the development of the theory of the non-stationary Universe. The scientist studied non-stationary homogeneous isotropic models with a space of positive curvature filled with dusty matter (with zero pressure). The nonstationarity of the considered models is described by the dependence of the radius of curvature and density on time, and the density varies in inverse proportion to the cube of the radius of curvature. Friedman identified the types of behavior of such models allowed by the gravitational equations, and Einstein's model of a stationary Universe turned out to be a special case. Refuted the opinion that the general theory of relativity requires the assumption of the finiteness of space. Friedman's results demonstrated that Einstein's equations do not lead to a single model of the Universe, whatever the cosmological constant. From the model of a homogeneous isotropic Universe it follows that as it expands, a red shift proportional to the distance should be observed. This was confirmed in 1929 by E.P. Hubb based on astronomical observations: the spectral lines in the spectra of galaxies turned out to be shifted towards the red end of the spectrum.