Which camera is the best? (2019). Comparison of Canon and Nikon cameras
There are a number of activities that you can do endlessly: look at fire, at water, crack seeds and... compare Canon and Nikon DSLRs. For all their differences between companies and branded lines of cameras, they have a lot in common (tens of years of competition have not been in vain). In our previous research, we carried out a general comparison of companies and their potential in terms of camera production. Today we will focus on specific models released at the beginning of the second decade of the 21st century. So, the ice has broken...
Comparison of Canon 600D and Nikon D5100
With a small gap from each other, the giant companies released budget-class DSLRs in 2011, which became incredibly popular among beginners and experienced photographers. The price of the devices is approximately the same.
Before moving on to the comparison, we can give you advice: go to the store right now and just try to figure it out, hold it in your hands for a little while, and minimally “use” both models. It may happen that on an intuitive level you will like some of them and the problem will disappear by itself.
The fact is that the models are competitors so similar that you are simply amazed, and in order to feel this difference between them, you need to work hard. The second question is whether the difference will be an advantage or just a feature of one or another model. So, as we see, you continue to read the article. This means that the question remains relevant.
A question of price and taste
Canon, although not as striking, is cheaper. And not least of all, this is due to the price of components. Nikon optics have always been more expensive than Canon's. The same Canon 50mm 1.8 lens costs half as much as Nikon's. Some people prefer Nikon optics because they are believed to give a clearer picture (however, is it always so necessary, this clear picture?! No one has canceled artistic photography, which requires a smoother picture). The dynamic range and ISO of the Nikon D5100 are also ahead of the Canon 600D.
But the Canon 600D is equipped with built-in autofocus (“screwdriver”), which only more expensive Nikon models have. The Canon D600 also has an EF-S mount, which makes it easy to choose the right optics for it.
Performance
One of the determining factors is speed: taking photographs and saving photographs. To be fast, efficient and reliable. The Canon 600D's processor works without problems and saves photos in both JPEG and RAW, works in Live View mode, it processes video material quite quickly, at maximum settings and even when using special effects. There are disadvantages that appear during continuous shooting (Nikon, in turn, does not have them) - it happens that the device freezes a little for a couple of seconds. Consequences of this kind can be prevented by slightly reducing the resolution of the final images. Pro tip: set it to 6 megapixels, not 18, as is the default.
By the way, if we take megapixels into account, the Nikon D5100 has the maximum possible number of 16, and the Canon EOS 600D has 18. Apparently, in terms of performance, Nikon has also thought of everything better. The device has a built-in EXPEED2 processor, which allows you to save pictures immediately. A split second - and you can continue the photo hunt further. And, apparently, there are no problems with serial shooting.
Some users note some slowdown when shooting video, to which professionals respond: “Buy and install high-speed SD (Ultra) memory cards and you will be happy.
Crop factor
For Canon 600D it is 1.5, for Nikon it is 1.6. The difference is completely insignificant. Both cameras have a CMOS type matrix. Within one tenth, the cameras shoot the same.
ISO
According to the stated official characteristics, the ISO range of both Canon and Nikon is the same. But test results show that Nikon is better in terms of noise reduction. When shooting at high ISO values (for example, 6400), the Nikon D5100 performs better than the Canon EOS 600D. If you lower ISO to 3200, the difference decreases significantly, although Nikon still has a slight advantage. If you shoot not in JPEG, but in RAW, then noise can be removed in Photoshop or Lightroom. Looking at the scale we have given, you can understand at what point the useful signal prevails over the noise level. The more harmonious the signal-to-noise ratio, the cleaner the image. The number +6dB means that the noise level is half as much. The discrepancy between the measuring points and the ISO values diverge somewhat, due to the fact that there is a difference between the sensitivity of the matrix declared by the manufacturer and the real one. Now let's move away from these tedious numbers and simply summarize: the declared parameters of the matrix and the real ones of the Canon 600D and Nikon D5100 are the same, but in practice Nikon is a little in the lead. But this only appears at high ISOs. As we already said in another article, it is better not to shoot at extreme indicators at all, but to look for the necessary balance empirically.
Shutter speed range
The models have no discrepancies with this. Both Canon and Nikon have it ranging from 1/4000 to 30 seconds.
Shooting video
Both Canon 600D and Nikon D5100 have a maximum resolution of 1920/1080. Both cameras allow you to shoot excellent Full HD video with good sound. Only Full HD videos on Nikon are produced with a maximum duration of 20 minutes, while on Canon they are only 12 minutes (since the file cannot “weigh” more than 4000 Mb.
In general, for a decent result, an HD resolution with parameters of 1280x720 will be enough, and this will significantly expand the timing. For Nikon, to start filming, you need to activate Live View, and then press the “Record” button. The position of the mode selection dial does not play a role in this case. Before starting filming, the Canon 600D is switched to the “video recording” position, after which “Record” is pressed.
Also, both models have the ability to make MPEG-4 videos. Both cameras have autofocus. Both the one and the other are not flawless. If you get your hands on it and focus on your eye, you can easily use manual focusing. Also, Canon 600D and Nikon D5100 have the ability to use an external microphone.
Why Canon is still better for video
We continue our comparison of Canon and Nikon DSLRs, extremely popular in 2011, which are still in demand today. And this subsection will turn out to be a little more dramatic than the previous ones, where, despite everything, we reconciled competitors. There is an indisputable fact that Canon, in particular, this model is more suitable for shooting video. In the case of the 600D, there is an option that allows you to manually set the exposure (ask any professional and they will tell you why this is good). The Canon EOS 600D also has a digital zoom.
Don’t rush to spit - in the case of point-and-shoot cameras, “zoom” is considered a bonus, in the case of DSLR it is an additional arsenal of expressive means. You can stretch an image obtained from an 18 MpX matrix to a two-megapixel crop without loss.
There is another unique option for the Canon 600D. It consists of shooting video material at a speed of about 60 frames per second, however, this can be done when shooting regular HD video. So, here are the obvious advantages of the Canon 600D over its equally stellar competitor: the ability to digital zoom, high-speed shooting and manual exposure control.
Comparison of Canon 60D and Nikon D5200
To compare these two equally popular models, we did a little research and turned to a popular site where such comparisons are honored. To begin with, the most basic things. Nikon's autofocus system wins. Now for the rest of the parameters.
Sensor size and more
Canon's sensor size is larger, which means better picture quality. But the Nikon D5200 has more focusing points (more than four times!), which means that the device has more flexible focusing capabilities. In addition, this makes it easier to find a more advantageous angle for focusing in automatic mode. In terms of ISO, the situation is the same as with the Canon 600D and Nikon D5100: the Nikon D5200 model can raise the light sensitivity to a higher level than the Canon 60D. But, as we have already said, you can shoot in RAW format and easily edit it in Photoshop or Lightroom.
Another option is fast continuous shooting when working with moving objects. Here Canon is slightly superior to its competitor. The output picture quality (photos and videos) is better from Nikon. Canon This model does not have a stereo microphone, which can allow you to record high-quality sound without using an external device. There is also such an indicator as a dynamic indicator. So, it is better than the Nikon D5200. What does it actually give? And it gives the output better detail of objects, even if you shoot in poor light.
Now let's dwell on those points where Nikon and Canon are equal. Both models have tracking focus (it allows you to focus correctly if the object is moving). Also, the Canon 60D and Nikon D5200 are equipped with a two-stage shutter, which allows you to focus when you press the shutter button halfway, and take pictures when you press it fully.
Let's summarize
Do you feel a little clearer after our mini-study? This may well be the case, and yet this is a debate without end and edge. Whoever undertakes to compare Canon and Nikon SLR cameras, he still comes to the conclusion that this is a matter of taste. In certain parameters, this or that model is superior to its analogue produced by another company. But she cannot surpass her in everything, just as in the opposite case.
Today there are six types of digital cameras. This is an entry-level compact camera, a high-end compact, and three DSLRs: an entry-level DSLR, a semi-professional one, and a professional one. The sixth type of camera is a system camera, otherwise known as a mirrorless camera. Each of them has its own advantages and disadvantages.
Now let’s try to compare cameras and tell you about each of them in more detail, and you can decide for yourself which camera is best to buy for you.
Entry-level digital compacts
So let's start with the entry-level compact. A distinctive feature of cameras in this class is the simplified control concept. In such devices there are almost never manual shooting modes, that is, the camera makes all the settings itself, leaving practically no freedom for the photographer to adjust the parameters. However, this is exactly good for you, because in order to start shooting you don’t need to read smart books on photography. It is enough to turn on the camera, aim at the subject, zoom if necessary and simply press the shutter button.
The technical characteristics of modern entry-level compacts are not as high as those of older models, but they are quite sufficient to take photographs for a home album and even print them on A4 format. The matrix resolution of such cameras is usually at least 7-8 megapixels. Zoom ratio 3 or slightly more. And the main indisputable advantage of such cameras is their low price and relative ease of operation.
Such cameras are small in size and weight, which allows you to always carry them with you. Therefore, if you are looking for the best camera to buy for family photos and for the family in general, then you can pay attention to cameras of this type.
To compare cameras, here are the main characteristics of the compact:
Entry-level compacts:
- - minimum settings;
- - fully automatic shooting;
- - resolution is about 10 megapixels, enough to print a photo of 20x30 cm;
- - low price.
The approximate price of such a device is $100-300.
Advanced compacts
This camera, unlike entry-level cameras, has a huge number of manual settings. Exposure parameters here can be set manually, however, this does not mean that there are not a large number of automatic modes and scene programs. In addition, with such devices you can use additional accessories, such as telephoto and wide-angle converters that are mounted on the lens and even real flashes; for this, a burning shoe is provided.
Pay attention to the camera controls; the control concept here is as close as possible to professional SLR cameras, that is, there are separate buttons for most functions, which allows you to change settings more quickly than if you searched for them through the menu.
The characteristics of such devices are usually not very bad. This is a 10-12 megapixel sensor, a 6x or more high-end lens and a 3-inch display. In price, these cameras are close to the younger models of DSLRs, but they have one very important advantage: the compact does not need to buy an additional lens. If you choose which camera is best to buy for a beginning photographer, then these cameras will probably suit most amateur photographers.
Top compacts:
- - a full set of manual and “creative” settings;
- - the control concept is close to SLR cameras;
- - high sensor resolution (at least 10 megapixels);
- - high-quality lens with large zoom;
- - the price can be the same as that of simple DSLRs.
Price ranges from $200-1000.
Entry-level DSLR
The first of the DSLR cameras in terms of technical excellence, this is an entry-level DSLR designed for beginner amateur photographers who want to take high-quality photographs.
Generally speaking, DSLRs have two main differences compared to compacts.
- Firstly, this is a larger matrix size and, as a result, lower noise levels and a higher level of photo quality.
- And secondly, it is the ability to install interchangeable lenses.
Initially, DSLRs are sold either as a “body” body or in a so-called “kit” kit with an inexpensive, usually 3x lens. Photographers determine the further development of their optics fleet independently. But it’s worth considering the fact that the cost of a good fast lens can exceed the price of the camera itself. Some buyers are looking for which camera is better: SLR or digital, but all cameras with a matrix instead of film are digital. Modern SLR cameras are also digital.
A feature of models of this type is simplified control and there are no hot buttons for calling frequently used functions; they are all hidden in the menu. This somewhat reduces the efficiency of control, but this concept is more convenient and understandable for novice amateur photographers; nothing distracts their attention.
In addition, entry-level DSLRs usually have slightly reduced functionality compared to older models. But the rest of the characteristics of such cameras are quite high and differ little from more expensive models. It has a sensor resolution of 10 megapixels and a large 2.5-inch screen.
This camera can be recommended for purchase by an amateur photographer who already wants to create artistic photographs. This type of camera is also suitable for beginner amateur photographers.
Entry-level DSLRs:
- - the most simplified management;
- - a larger matrix than in compacts: higher image quality;
- - Possible incompatibility with some lenses.
The price can be from $400 to $1500.
Semi-professional DSLRs
Expensive semi-professional DSLRs differ from the entry-level ones in more advanced controls. For most functions there are separate buttons, which are located both on the top panel and on the back. Thus, management becomes more efficient. Such devices have a high burst shooting speed of about 5 frames per second versus 3 for amateur DSLRs, which allows them to be used for intensive shooting, including reporting.
The functionality of such devices is much wider. For example, many models support a wireless flash control system from the built-in one, have more different fine settings, set white balance by color temperature, and change sensitivity in smaller increments.
In general, a novice amateur photographer is unlikely to need all these additional features; most likely, a simpler and cheaper DSLR will suffice. But if you plan to develop your photography skills or even make money from photography, perhaps you should pay attention to semi-professional level DSLRs. In some situations, such cameras can even be purchased for professional photography.
Semi-professional DSLRs:
- - developed management system;
- - “hot” buttons for quick access to many functions;
- - ability to fine-tune parameters.
Price 1000-3000$.
Professional SLR cameras
Professional SLR cameras differ from the semi-professional class by even higher characteristics, the ability to work at even shorter shutter speeds, higher burst speeds of up to 9-11 frames per second, higher matrix resolution, in some models it is 22 megapixels, sometimes a larger physical size of the matrix, up to to a full film frame.
The cases of such devices, as a rule, are dust- and moisture-proof and they are made not of plastic, but of metal. In general, their reliability exceeds that of simpler models. Typically these cameras are quite large and heavy.
Generally speaking, they should be considered more of a professional's tool than a hobby camera. Naturally, their characteristics are impressive compared to other cameras, but only professional photographers can fully reveal them.
The cost of such devices ranges from $2,000 to $6,000, but many models cost tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, in the question of which camera is better to buy for professional photography, such models can take both first place if the device is purchased by a professional, and last if the purchase is for an amateur photographer.
Professional DSLRs:
- - all technical parameters: the maximum possible at this stage of technology development;
- - the highest reliability of the camera;
- - dust- and moisture-proof housing;
- - a huge number of settings;
- - large size and heavy weight;
- - high price.
The price can reach several tens of thousands of dollars.
Mirrorless cameras
Cameras with interchangeable lenses, but without a mirror in their design, are called mirrorless or otherwise system cameras. Such cameras can have a matrix of very different sizes (depending on the model) and at the same time you can change the lens on them.
So they have all the advantages of DSLRs (large sensor and interchangeable lens). But at the same time they turn out to be smaller in size and weight, because they do not have a mirror. In terms of the quality of the resulting photographs, they are equal to SLR cameras, at least the best models of system cameras, but their advantage is their weight and size.
So these cameras can be purchased by both amateur and novice photographers as well as professionals.
Mirrorless (system) camera
If you choose which camera is better to buy for traveling?, then we can recommend a camera with sufficient characteristics to create high-quality photographs. This could be an advanced compact, any mirrorless camera, or an entry-level DSLR camera. The advantage of compacts on this list may be their small size and weight. To photograph distant objects, it is advisable to have a lens with a zoom factor greater than 10.
For system and SLR cameras, you need to have several lenses; you can either carry them all at once or select the appropriate lens in advance if you know what scenes you will be shooting. It is important to have a spare battery when traveling, especially if problems with recharging may arise. To record data about the photography location, you can purchase a camera with built-in GPS, and if you want to immediately upload your photos to the Internet, you also need a Wi-Fi module.
If for a film camera the main thing was the quality of the optics and shutter, and the choice of film, developing and printing methods could significantly vary the quality of the frames, then with a digital camera the first thing is the matrix: alas, it cannot be changed.
Let's remember a little physics: when working at maximum resolution, each physical pixel corresponds to one pixel in the image. The larger the actual dimensions of this pixel, the better its signal-to-noise ratio will be, the less the image quality will be affected by neighboring pixels of the matrix and even its cable (it will always collect some kind of interference, especially in a plastic case).
So, the larger the matrix and the fewer pixels on it, the better. But here the need to have a sufficient number of them comes into force, especially if you plan to print pictures in large format or publish photos in high resolution. As for the size of the matrix, the “reference point” is the full frame, in other words, the matrix of the dimensions of a regular frame of small-format photographic film, 24*36 mm. All smaller matrices are described by a crop factor, the ratio of size to full frame - that is, if an FF matrix has a crop factor of 1, then a matrix with a crop factor of 1.5 will be exactly one and a half times smaller. With the development of modern technologies, more than decent quality is provided by APS-C matrices with a 1.5-1.6 crop, Four Thirds (commonly used by Olympus) and even inch matrices with a 2.7 crop. Smaller sizes will require attention, especially those so often used in inexpensive compacts 1/2.3” (crop 6).
Some analogue of photographic film in digital photography is the RAW format - essentially, raw data from the matrix is saved into a file, which opens up wide possibilities for editing the source. Shooting in JPEG is easier, especially for novice photographers, but often the photo is either compressed with an inevitable loss of quality, or “blurred” by software anti-noise, masking the low quality of the matrix.
Article text updated: 02/23/2019
Very soon, on November 14, 2013, sales of the new generation of entry-level SLR camera Nikon D5300 will begin. The cost of the carcass is 300 dollars more expensive than my Nikon D5100. Let's try to analyze whether the game is worth the candle, does it make sense for a beginner, when buying his first DSLR, to pay 300 bucks more for a camera without a lens?
In many respects, the new model is superior to my camera, as well as the previous D5200 model and the even simpler and older version of the D3100. Therefore, at first glance, a novice amateur photographer has an answer to the question “which camera should I buy?” There is no doubt: the one that has more advanced technical characteristics. However, given my two years of experience shooting with a DSLR camera, I am ready to challenge this opinion.
In my opinion, this approach has the right to life when purchasing professional DSLRs with which you will compete for orders from your clients. But Nikon D5300 is an entry-level amateur camera. And, may I not incur the wrath of the Nikon Corporation marketers, it would be more logical for a novice amateur photographer to spend a minimum of money on an “older” model of the camera and a good lens, get the highest quality picture and be satisfied with the result. And to follow this logic, the new camera is not very suitable. And that's why…
Comparison of Nikon D3100, D5100, D5200 and D5300 cameras
First, let's see who's who in my comparison review.
Camera Nikon D3100 – the youngest model in the line of SLR devices from Nikon. It went on sale in 2010. It has slightly simpler technical characteristics than my D5100 KIT 18-55. However, with a good lens, it is capable of producing a better picture than my camera with standard glass.
My DSLR Nikon D5100 has been on sale since the second quarter of 2011. I purchased it in November 2011 in time to film on a solo trip to China, Hong Kong and the Philippines (a review of that trip has yet to be blogged). But you can look at a report about a trip by savages driving a rented car in Sri Lanka with examples of photos taken with this combination: camera + AF-S DX VR Zoom-Nikkor 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G kit lens. And in general, almost all the photographs taken before June 2013 were taken with this system, when I began to buy additional lenses (Nikkor 70-300 telephoto, Samyang 14 mm/2.8 wide-angle and Nikkor 17-55/2.8 universal zoom).
Nikon D5200 DSLR camera replaced my old one at the end of 2012. Until today, I have not delved into the details of the technical parameters of this DSLR, but below we will see what the differences are and whether they have significant advantages over the Nikon D5100.
Well, the subject of today’s review is a new product Nikon D5300. Sales will start in mid-November 2013. In many respects it is superior to the previously listed cameras. There is only one drawback - for sure, at the beginning of sales, stores will ask inadequate money for it.
Let's go to the official website of the company in Russia and check the boxes to compare camera parameters. I also added the older model D7100 (I won’t compare it directly in the article, but I’ll make a couple of comments at the end). And before we start discussing the advantages and disadvantages of each camera, I want to make important notes:
How I process photos for articles
If you are interested, you can read it. We discuss how the JPEG and RAW formats differ, what basic processing steps exist, and what is the difference between Lightroom and Photoshop.The problem of choosing a camera from the budget price segment is always especially acute for beginners who are trying to understand the variety of models, characteristics and prices. Which Canon camera should you choose? Save money and buy a cheaper DSLR, with only the most necessary set of functions? Or choose the best option in terms of price/quality ratio? Or maybe pay a little extra and get a camera that meets all the requirements of a modern photographer? In any case, the choice is yours. We will help you understand the intricacies and make the right choice when buying a Canon camera.
Today we have four entry-level Canon DSLRs in our big comparison test: Canon EOS 4000D, Canon EOS 1300D, Canon EOS 2000D and Canon EOS 200D. We have already tested each of them separately.
Main characteristics of entry-level models:
| Canon EOS 4000D | Canon EOS 1300D | Canon EOS 2000D | Canon EOS 200D | |
| APS-C sensor | 18 MP | 18 MP | 24.1 MP | 24.2 MP |
| Cleaning the Image Sensor | Manual cleaning and data acquisition for dust removal | Manual cleaning and data acquisition for dust removal | Built-in EOS cleaning system | |
| Focus points | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 |
| Dual Pixel CMOS AF | No | No | No | Yes |
| CPU | DIGIC 4+ | DIGIC 4+ | DIGIC 4+ | DIGIC 7 |
| Optical viewfinder | Yes (without diopter adjustment) | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| LCD Screen | 2.7 inches (6.8 cm) / approx. 230 thousand pixels | 3.0 inches (7.5 cm) / approx. 920 thousand pixels | 3.0 inches (7.7 cm) / approx. 1040k dots sRGB / rotatable, touch | |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3 fps | 3 fps | 3 fps | 5 fps |
| Buffer volume, number of files | JPEG: until the memory card is full / RAW: 6 / RAW+JPEG: 5 | JPEG:1110 / RAW: 6 / RAW+JPEG: 5 | JPEG: 150 / RAW: 11 / RAW+JPEG: 6 | JPEG: until the memory card is full / RAW: 11 / RAW+JPEG: 6 |
| Video recording | Full HD 30p | Full HD 30p | Full HD 30p | Full HD 60p |
| Scene Intelligent Mode | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Wired Interfaces | USB, HDMI | USB, HDMI, remote control | USB, HDMI, remote control | USB, HDMI, remote control, stereo microphone |
| Wireless interfaces | WiFi | Wi-Fi, NFC | Wi-Fi, NFC | Wi-Fi, NFC, Bluetooth |
| Built-in flash | Yes | Yes (automatic rise) | Yes (automatic rise) | Yes (automatic rise) |
| Creative filters | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Photo Companion App | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Dimensions, mm | 129.0×101.6×77.1 | 129.0×101.3×77.6 | 129.0×101.3×77.6 | 122.4×92.6×69.8 |
| Weight (with memory card and battery), g | 436 | 485 | 475 | 453 |
As we can see from the table, the simplest model in this team is Canon EOS 4000D, the two middle ones are Canon EOS 1300D and Canon EOS 2000D, and the most advanced is Canon EOS 200D. In the line of Canon DSLRs, the models with the lowest index have always had higher performance, and this is clearly visible here. But why then does the Canon EOS 2000D have an image sensor with a resolution of 24 megapixels, while the Canon EOS 1300D has only 18 megapixels? Let's try to figure out how to get acquainted with cameras.
Let's first see what unites them? The image sensors, on which color rendition and image quality depend, are of the same format (APS-C) in these models, and they are relatively large - 22.3 × 14.9 mm. In our case, the sensors differ in resolution - 18 or 24 megapixels. In all models they are relatively new, except for the Canon EOS 4000D. This is not the first year we have seen a similar sensor in Canon DSLRs. We will still evaluate how different it is from its brothers and whether it differs at all from the picture.
Sensors of the same format are installed in most amateur and even semi-professional DSLRs of recent times. They are usually capable of producing high image quality when shooting in low light and effectively blurring the background when shooting close-up objects.
Canon EOS 200D / Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM SETTINGS: ISO 400, F5.6, 1/50 s, 135.0 mm equiv.
Canon EOS 200D / Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS II USM SETTINGS: ISO 1600, F6.3, 1/1000 s, 300.0 mm equiv.
All cameras have an optical viewfinder, which gives an advantage when shooting in bright sunlight and in focusing speed compared to shooting with a view on the display. In addition, unlike electronic viewfinders, it does not consume battery power, which has a positive effect on battery life. The only difference with the Canon EOS 4000D viewfinder is that it does not have a smooth diopter adjustment (fixed -1.0 D), and people with imperfect vision may find it uncomfortable when shooting without glasses. True, you can look for a replacement E-series diopter adjustment lens with the desired characteristics.
It is also worth mentioning the autofocus system common to all cameras through the viewfinder. It includes 9 phase detection autofocus points that can focus on anything. Each of the 9 points can be selected manually, thereby ensuring high accuracy of focusing on the subject that interests you, and not the camera’s automation. The central sensor is cross-type, which provides increased focusing accuracy.
All cameras are also equipped with a Wi-Fi module for remote camera control and transfer of captured images to mobile devices using the free Camera Connect application (for iOS and Android). Now I’ll tell you in more detail about the features of each of the cameras.
Canon EOS 4000D
Everything in this model, from the technical stuffing to the menu with tips and creative modes, tells us that this is the youngest model in the line and is intended for those who are just starting to get acquainted with photography and want to quickly start taking cool pictures with minimal immersion into technical details.
The most important features of the Canon EOS 4000D:
- relatively old 18-megapixel image sensor;
- 2.7-inch built-in LCD screen with a low resolution of 230 thousand dots;
- the presence of only a Wi-Fi module for transferring pictures to a smartphone and remote control of the camera;
- optical viewfinder without diopter adjustment (see above);
- built-in guide-assistant for camera functions.
Canon EOS 4000D is the minimum set of essentials for your first steps in photography.
Canon EOS 1300D and Canon EOS 2000D
Two twin brothers. Not only are these cameras similar to each other, but they are also not much different from the Canon EOS 4000D. I constantly confused them during the preparation of the review. I was afraid not to take any shots with both cameras. The only thing that helped was the nameplate with the name of the model. The differences compared to the Canon EOS 4000D are almost cosmetic.
Main features of Canon EOS 1300D and Canon EOS 2000D:
- more modern image sensors: 18 MP in Canon EOS 1300D and 24.1 MP in Canon EOS 2000D;
- LCD screen with a diagonal of 3 inches (7.5 cm) and a resolution of 920 thousand pixels;
- viewfinder with diopter adjustment;
- in addition to Wi-Fi, there is an NFC module for quickly establishing communication with Android devices;
- Automatic flash that pops up and fires itself in poor lighting conditions.
We will check the differences in the image produced by the Canon EOS 1300D and Canon EOS 2000D sensors a little later.
Canon EOS 200D
As for Canon EOS 200D, this is no longer a junior level, but rather a middle class, which received all the best from older cameras.
Features and benefits of Canon EOS 200D:
- Dual Pixel CMOS AF technology for fast and accurate focusing on the LCD screen (49 AF points);
- rotating touch screen with a diagonal of 3 inches and a resolution of 1040 thousand sRGB dots;
- built-in EOS sensor cleaning system;
- more powerful modern DIGIC 7 processor;
- continuous shooting up to 5 frames/s;
- Full HD video recording at 60 fps;
- Wi-Fi, NFC, Bluetooth modules.
But the most important thing is that the Canon EOS 200D stands out from its budget counterparts in terms of accuracy and efficiency of shooting control: Dual Pixel CMOS AF technology and a rotating touch display provide a completely different interaction between the photographer and the camera, since instant refocusing and even shooting with one touch of the LCD are possible. screen. It doesn’t look much like an entry-level DSLR, does it?
Past Continuous Tense
English levels: from A1 to C2, from Beginner to Proficiency
Participial and adverbial phrases in English
Phrasal verb of the week: to come up